A composite biomarker approach to withhold neoadjuvant chemotherapy in select muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.

J Joep Jacobus de Jong (Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands) M Marla Johnson (Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) J James A. Proudfoot (Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA) I Inge de Kruijff (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) J Jaco Kraan (Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) E Elai Davicioni J John W.M. Martens (Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) N Nick Beije (Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) E Ewan Gibb (Department Of Urologic Sciences, University Of British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada) G Geert Van Leenders (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) J Joost L. Boormans (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

841 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, we propose a composite biomarker approach of circulating tumor cell status and gene expression to select patients in whom NAC may be omitted. Methods: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) samples were collected from patients with cT2-T4aN0-N1M0 MIBC who were included in the prospective CirGuidance study (NL3954), in which circulating tumor cells (CTC) were enumerated using the CELLSEARCH system. Expression profiling was performed using the validated Decipher Bladder genomic subtyping classifier to determine luminal and non-luminal molecular subtypes (Veracyte, Inc.). The luminal favorable subtype was determined using a lncRNA-based classifier (de Jong et al. 2019 & 2024). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality (CSM), calculated from the date of study inclusion to the date of bladder cancer related death. Results: In the CirGuidance study (n = 231), most patients (n = 213; 92%) underwent RC without NAC, while (n = 18) received NAC plus RC. Among RC-only patients, CTCneg status (n = 172) was associated with a two-year CSM of 21% versus 41% in CTCpos patients (Gray’s test, p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the distribution of molecular subtypes between CTCpos or CTCneg patient subgroups. Within CTCneg patients treated with RC alone, 2-year CSM was 14% in luminal (n = 77, 36%) versus 25% in non-luminal (n = 136, 64%) whereas in CTCpos patients it was 38% and 44%, respectively. Among 18 NAC plus RC treated patients, non-luminal subtype (n = 10) had a two-year CSM of 11%, whereas in luminal subtype it was 27%, similar to outcomes when treated with RC alone. Importantly, the lncRNA-based luminal favorable classifier identified 26 patients with luminal favorable subtype among CTCneg patients with 0% CSM at two years (MVA p = 0.02) when treated with RC alone. Conclusions: We identified a biomarker-defined subgroup of MIBC with more favorable outcomes after RC alone. These findings support the future prospective validation of CTC and molecular subtyping as a tool to guide NAC selection.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 841-841
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

J

Joep Jacobus de Jong

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

M

Marla Johnson

Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

J

James A. Proudfoot

Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA

I

Inge de Kruijff

Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

J

Jaco Kraan

Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

E

Elai Davicioni

J

John W.M. Martens

Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

N

Nick Beije

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

E

Ewan Gibb

Department Of Urologic Sciences, University Of British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

G

Geert Van Leenders

Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

J

Joost L. Boormans

Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands