A ferroptosis-suppressive tumor state to drive chemoradiotherapy resistance and define a therapeutic vulnerability in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Abstract
195 Background: Bladder-preserving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a curative alternative to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet durable disease control is limited by intrinsic resistance whose basis remains unclear. Methods: We performed transcriptomic profiling of pretreatment tumors from 179 patients uniformly treated with CRT and integrated gene expression with clinical outcomes, molecular subtype features, and immune contexture. Functional validation used CRT-resistant bladder cancer models and genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening under irradiation (IR). Results: We identified a ferroptosis-suppressive transcriptional signature (FSS) that defines a distinct resistance state and independently predicts radiographic progression-free and overall survival after CRT. High-FSS tumors showed inferior outcomes and were enriched for basal/squamous and immune-excluded phenotypes with reduced immune infiltration. This state was recapitulated in experimentally derived CRT-resistant models. CRISPR screening under IR identified core ferroptosis suppressor genes as essential survival dependencies and radiosensitizers, and pharmacologic ferroptosis induction restored radiosensitivity in resistant cells. Conclusions: A ferroptosis-suppressive state represents a mechanistically defined resistance program linking tumor-intrinsic transcriptional circuitry, immune microenvironment architecture, and therapeutic vulnerability. These findings establish ferroptosis regulation as a clinically actionable axis for risk stratification and therapeutic intensification in bladder-preserving MIBC. Multivariable Cox models evaluating clinicopathologic factors and FSS for radiographic progression-free survival. Multivariable Cox for rPFS HR (95% CI) P value Multivariable Cox for OS HR (95% CI) P value FSS High / Low 2.58 (1.64-4.05) <0.001*** FSS High / Low 2.79 (1.66-4.67) <0.001*** N1 / N0 2.44 (1.46-4.08) 0.001** LVI (+) / (-) 2.18 (1.14-4.16) 0.018* Ba/Sq / Others 2.06 (1.26-3.36) 0.004** With variant / pure UC 1.69 (0.89-3.19) 0.109 LVI (+) / (-) 1.71 (1.00-2.92) 0.048* N1 / N0 1.64 (0.92-2.95) 0.095 With variant / pure UC 1.52 (0.84-2.77) 0.168 Ba/Sq / Others 1.40 (0.82-2.40) 0.214 Grade high / low 1.38 (0.49-3.88) 0.539 cT stage > T2 / <T2 1.16 (0.70-1.92) 0.561 cT stage > T2 / <T2 1.33 (0.85-2.08) 0.219 Grade high / low 1.04 (0.33-3.30) 0.942 CIS (+) / (-) 0.57 (0.30-1.07) 0.081 Age ≥ 75 / <75 0.70 (0.38-1.28) 0.245 Age ≥ 75 / <75 0.55 (0.32-0.96) 0.036* CIS (+) / (-) 0.41 (0.18-0.97) 0.041* rPFS, radiographic progression-free survival; OS, overall survival (OS); HR, Hazard ratios; CI, confidence intervals; FSS, ferroptosis-suppressive signature; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; Ba/Sq, basal/squamous subtype; UC, urothelial carcinoma; CIS, carcinoma in situ. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Takuya Tsujino
Shogo Yamazaki
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
Tomoaki Takai
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
Kazuki Nishimura
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
Kazumasa Komura
Akihide Yoshimi
Haruhito Azuma