A global comparative study on real-world clinical and genomic differences in advanced biliary tract cancer.

O Oluseyi Abidoye (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) C Celine Hoyek (Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) B Binbin Zheng-Lin (Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR) H Heidi E. Kosiorek (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ) C Cody Eslinger (Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) M Mohamad Bassam Sonbol C Christina Wu (Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) N Nguyen H. Tran (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) H Hani M. Babiker (Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) T Takayuki Yoshino (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) M Masafumi Ikeda C Chigusa Morizane H Hideaki Bando Y Yoshiaki Nakamura T Takao Fujisawa T Taro Shibuki D Daniel H. Ahn (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) L Lewis R. Roberts M Mitesh J. Borad (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

Abstract

628 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are aggressive malignancies with poor survival outcomes and limited treatment options. This study compared the epidemiological and molecular differences of advanced BTC patients through a global collaboration involving the Mayo Clinic and National Cancer Center Hospital East. Methods: We included patients with advanced BTC who underwent comprehensive tumor molecular profiling who received at least 30 days of systemic therapy. Patients were grouped based on specific alterations. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of first-line therapy until death and compared among subgroups using Cox regression models. Results: 332 (36%) out of 932 patients had at least one actionable mutation : somatic BRCA1/2 mutations N=106, FGFR2 fusions N=61, HER2 amplifications N=65, KRAS G12C/D mutations N=46, IDH1 mutations N=38, and TMB >10 mut/Mb N=16. BRCA1/2 -mutated BTC were more commonly found in older Asian males with intrahepatic tumors and often presented with peritoneal and liver metastases upon initial diagnosis. FGFR2 fusions were more prevalent in younger White females with intrahepatic tumors, while HER2 amplifications were mainly seen in Asian females with gallbladder tumors. KRAS mutations were primarily observed in Asian males, and IDH1 mutations were common in White males with intrahepatic tumors, frequently presenting with liver metastasis. Survival outcomes varied significantly based on the alteration type: patients with FGFR2 fusions had the longest median OS (mOS) at 23.3 months (mo) (95%CI 18.4-34.9), followed by those with IDH1 mutations (19.3 mo; 95% CI 17.4-NE) and TMB >10 mut/Mb (17.8 mo; 95% CI 13.6-NE). BRCA mutations had a mOS of 16 mo (95% CI 14.6-19.8), while HER2 amplifications and KRAS mutations had mOS of 15.5 (95% CI 11.9-20.2) and 11.6 mo (95% CI 10.0-20.9), respectively. Conclusions: These findings underscore the heterogeneity in clinical and genomic characteristics among BTC patients, highlighting the importance of tailored therapeutic approaches. Baseline patient characteristics stratified by mutation status. KRAS G12C/D (N=46) BRCA 1/2 (N=106) IDH1 (N=38) HER2 amplification(N=65) FGFR2 fusion(N=61) TMB>10 mut/Mb(N=16) P-value Median Age, year 67 68 64 66 52 73 <0.001 Female, n (%) 19 (41) 34 (32) 18(47) 34 (52) 45(74) 6 (38) <0.001 Race, n (%) <0.001 Asian 31 (67) 97 (92) 13 (34) 51 (79) 10 (16) 6 (38) White 14 (30) 8 (8) 24 (63) 13 (20) 48 (79) 10 (63) Primary tumor location, n (%) <0.001 Intrahepatic 28 (68) 45 (45) 33 (100) 19 (31) 54(95) 10 (67) Extrahepatic 9 (22) 27(27) 0 (0) 10 (16) 2 (4) 4 (27) Gallbladder 4 (10) 28 (28) 0 (0) 32 (53) 1 (2) 1 (7) Sites of Metastasis at diagnosis, n (%) Abdominal Wall / Peritoneal 9 (24) 15 (19) 4(13) 7 (12) 6 (10) 4 (27) 0.309 Bone 33 (92) 70 (90) 26 (87) 2 (3) 9(15) 0 (0) 0.212 Liver 20 (49) 52 (61) 28 (82) 45 (73) 45 (76) 6 (38) 0.001 Lung 26 (70) 65 (82) 22 (69) 36 (58) 27(45) 11 (69) 0.006

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 628-628
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

O

Oluseyi Abidoye

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

C

Celine Hoyek

Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

B

Binbin Zheng-Lin

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR

H

Heidi E. Kosiorek

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

C

Cody Eslinger

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

M

Mohamad Bassam Sonbol

C

Christina Wu

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

N

Nguyen H. Tran

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

H

Hani M. Babiker

Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

T

Takayuki Yoshino

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

M

Masafumi Ikeda

C

Chigusa Morizane

H

Hideaki Bando

Y

Yoshiaki Nakamura

T

Takao Fujisawa

T

Taro Shibuki

D

Daniel H. Ahn

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

L

Lewis R. Roberts

M

Mitesh J. Borad

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab