A phase 1/2 clinical trial of quaratusugene ozeplasmid gene therapy and atezolizumab maintenance therapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

B Bo Wang K Kartik Konduri (SCRI at Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX) R Robert M. Jotte D Donald A. Richards (Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX) R Rachel E. Sanborn (Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) A Alexander I. Spira (Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax) D David Michael Waterhouse (OHC (Oncology Hematology Care)/US Oncology Network, Cincinnati, OH) K Katherin Combs (Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX) J Jacqueline Opiola (Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX) M Mark S. Berger (Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX) D Daniel Morgensztern (Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis)

Abstract

TPS8126 Background: The addition of atezolizumab (atezo) to both induction therapy and maintenance therapy for patients with ES-SCLC has improved median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (New Eng J Med. 2018;379:2220-9). However, the median PFS from starting atezo maintenance was only 2.6 months (J Thoracic Onc. 2022;17:1122-9). Expression of TUSC2, a tumor suppressor gene, is absent in 41% of SCLC patients and is decreased in 100% of SCLC patients (Clin Cancer Res 2008;14(1):41–47). Quaratusugene ozeplasmid (QuarOze) gene therapy consists of a DNA plasmid expressing the TUSC2 gene encapsulated in a positively charged lipoplex which delivers the TUSC2 gene to cancer cells, restoring TUSC2 expression. Xenograft studies using a SCLC cell line in a humanized mouse model treated with a combination of QuarOze and atezo demonstrated significantly increased tumor cell killing compared to that of atezo alone. In addition, infiltration of immune cells was increased in the tumor tissue, whereas myeloid derived suppressor cells were decreased (Meraz IM et al, AACR/NCI/EORTC 2023). Thus, in this study QuarOze is added to atezo maintenance therapy with the aim of improving PFS after the start of maintenance therapy. Methods: Eligible patients have ES-SCLC and have completed 3-4 cycles of induction therapy with etoposide, a platinum agent, and atezo without disease progression, and are thus eligible for maintenance therapy. QuarOze is administered IV every 21 days in escalating dose cohorts in Phase 1 and atezo 1200 mg is also administered IV every 21 days. Dexamethasone, acetaminophen, and diphenhydramine are given prior to each treatment to prevent delayed infusion-related reactions. Efficacy is evaluated after every even cycle of treatment using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Safety is evaluated using CTCAE v5, with dose limiting toxicities generally defined as ≥Gr 3 adverse events (AEs). TUSC2 protein expression is measured by a validated immunohistochemistry assay in paraffin sections to determine if PFS is related to pretreatment TUSC2 levels. A validated assay measures pharmacokinetics in all patients. In Phase 1, two planned dose levels (0.09, and 0.12 mg/kg) of QuarOze were administered, and a standard dose escalation with 3-6 patients/dose level was used. The Phase 2 portion of the trial will enroll 50 patients which provides 80% power at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 to detect an 18-week PFS rate of 52% compared to a historical 18-week PFS rate of 34% with atezo alone. This corresponds to a median PFS of approximately 4.3 months compared to a historical median PFS of 2.6 months with atezo alone. A Safety Review Committee (SRC) reviewed safety data at the end of each dose level of Phase 1 to make recommendations about dose escalation. The Phase 2 portion of the trial opened for enrollment in December, 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05703971 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

B

Bo Wang

K

Kartik Konduri

SCRI at Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX

R

Robert M. Jotte

D

Donald A. Richards

Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX

R

Rachel E. Sanborn

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

A

Alexander I. Spira

Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax

D

David Michael Waterhouse

OHC (Oncology Hematology Care)/US Oncology Network, Cincinnati, OH

K

Katherin Combs

Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX

J

Jacqueline Opiola

Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX

M

Mark S. Berger

Genprex, Inc., Austin, TX

D

Daniel Morgensztern

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis