A randomized phase 2 peri-operative (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant) study of fianlimab (anti–LAG-3) plus cemiplimab (anti–PD-1) versus anti–PD-1 alone in patients with resectable stage III and IV melanoma.

R Rodabe Navroze Amaria (Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Axel Hauschild (Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Kiel, Germany) M Michael Lowe (Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA) J Janis M. Taube (Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore) A Adil Daud (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) T Thach-Giao Truong (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Sarah A. Weiss (Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ) A Ankit Mangla (University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH) T Tapan Miyani (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) D Deidre Williams (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) F Fang Fang S Shuquan Chen (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) M Mark Salvati (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) I Israel Lowy (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) R Rossella Marullo (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) M Matthew G. Fury (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) K Karl Lewis (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) H Humberto Lara-Guerra (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY)

Abstract

TPS9596 Background: Prior studies demonstrated use of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improves event-free survival (EFS) compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant ICI therapy alone, supporting that peri-operative (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant) ICI therapy improves survival outcomes in patients (pts) with clinical stage III and resectable IV melanoma (Mel). Initial efforts in Mel trials to explore combined blockade by anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti–PD-1) and anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (anti–LAG-3) antibodies produced incrementally better efficacy than blockade of the PD-1 pathway alone. However, these efforts may not have provided optimal blockade of the two pathways. We have utilized VelocImmune technology to create potentially best-in-class, high-affinity, fully human immunoglobulin G4-blocking antibodies, fianlimab (FIAN; anti–LAG-3) and cemiplimab (CEMI; anti–PD-1). In a multicohort study (NCT03005782), FIAN + CEMI demonstrated reproducibly high clinical activity (objective response rate [ORR]: 57%; median progression-free survival: 24 months; N=98) in three independent cohorts of pts who were naïve to anti–PD-1 treatment in the advanced Mel setting, with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, the combination of FIAN + CEMI warrants an investigation as a peri-operative regimen in resectable, clinically detectable, high-risk, stage III and IV cutaneous Mel. Methods: This is a randomized Phase 2 peri-operative study (NCT06190951) in pts with clinical stage III/IV Mel with resectable disease. Pts will receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy followed by complete surgical resection, and continue with an optional 15 cycles of adjuvant therapy, based on pathological response. The primary objective is to compare the effect of FIAN + CEMI versus CEMI alone as measured by the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Approximately 150 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to three arms (intravenously once every 3 weeks): Arm A, CEMI 350 mg + placebo; Arm B, High Dose FIAN + CEMI 350 mg; Arm C, Low Dose FIAN + CEMI 350 mg. Pts will be stratified based on tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage and geographical region. Key inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years; resectable clinical stage III/IV histologically confirmed Mel; pts with stage III Mel must have clinically detectable disease; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and kidney function. The primary endpoint is pCR rate by blinded independent pathological review performed centrally. The secondary endpoints are pCR rate (by local assessment), major pathological response (by local and central review), EFS, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, relapse-free survival, ORR, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT06190951 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

R

Rodabe Navroze Amaria

Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Axel Hauschild

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Kiel, Germany

M

Michael Lowe

Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

J

Janis M. Taube

Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore

A

Adil Daud

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

T

Thach-Giao Truong

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Sarah A. Weiss

Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ

A

Ankit Mangla

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

T

Tapan Miyani

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

D

Deidre Williams

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

F

Fang Fang

S

Shuquan Chen

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

M

Mark Salvati

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

I

Israel Lowy

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY

R

Rossella Marullo

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

M

Matthew G. Fury

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY

K

Karl Lewis

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY

H

Humberto Lara-Guerra

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY