A randomized phase 2 study of enhanced AR blockade with enzalutamide in high-risk patients with biochemical relapse undergoing salvage radiation: Final results from RTOG 3506 (STEEL).

E Edwin Melencio Posadas (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) H Hiram Alberto Gay (Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) S Stephanie Pugh (Statistical Center, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA) T Todd Matthew Morgan (Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) Y Ying Xiao (CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging) J James B. Yu (Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH) J Jeff M. Michalski (Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) M Myriam Bouchard (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada) N Neil B. Desai (Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) R Ryan Funk (Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA - Maplewood, Maplewood, MN) K Krisha J. Howell (Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Troy, MI) D Donald James Jurgens (CentraCare Health System, Sartell, MN) A Anthony C. Wong (Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) X Xinglei Shen (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) L Lloyd Miyawaki (Marin Cancer Institute, Greenbrae, CA) B Betty Thompson (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) S Stephanie Greenstein Braun (Astellas, Northbrook, IL) T Trevor Wray Johnson (Amercian College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA) F Felix Y. Feng P Paul Nguyen (Department of Physics, University of Washington 2 , Seattle, Washington 98195,)

Abstract

156 Background: Patients with high-risk features who experience biochemical relapse (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) benefit from the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to salvage radiotherapy (SRT). We hypothesized that enhanced androgen receptor (AR) blockade (eARB) with enzalutamide would improve SRT outcomes for high-risk patients. Methods: Post-RP patients who had BCR (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) with at least 1 high-risk feature (Gleason 8-10, seminal vesicle invasion, pN1, persistent PSA >0.1 ng/mL after RP, and PSA ≥ 0.7 ng/mL) were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 24 months of standard ADT (sADT) with an LHRH analog (LHRHa) or eARB comprised of LHRHa + enzalutamide 160 mg daily. Progression free survival (PFS) was analyzed with progression defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL or initiation of new therapy following SRT. Results: Between April 2019 and August 2022, 188 patients were enrolled. The patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Median age was 64 years. Nodal involvement (pN1), pT3a-b, and Gleason 9 were noted in 22%, 77%, and 52% of patients, respectively. Over 70% had ≥2 aggressive features. Median follow-up time at the time of this report was 34.6 months. Prostatic fossa and pelvic SRT were mandatory. Para-aortic radiotherapy (RT), and lymph node and prostatic fossa lesion RT boosts were left at the discretion of the radiation oncologist. The SRT+eARB arm had better PFS when compared to the SRT+sADT arm (HR=0.62, 80% CI: 0.42-0.91, one-sided p=0.052). The rate of biochemical failure at 2 years was 19% (95% CI: 12-28) in the SRT+sADT arm as compared to 11% (95% CI: 5-18) in the SRT+eARB arm. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to sADT vs. eARB were 19% vs. 30%, while Grade 4 AEs were 4% vs. 2%, respectively. The most common AEs (all grades, >15%) included hot flashes, fatigue, diarrhea, and decreased lymphocytes. The grade 3+ AEs (>3%) included decreased lymphocytes and hypertension. Conclusions: The addition of enzalutamide to standard ADT resulted in an improvement of PFS following SRT, warranting a phase 3 trial. The increase in toxicity was consistent with other studies of enzalutamide and did not identify new safety concerns. Clinical trial information: NCT03809000 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 156-156
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

E

Edwin Melencio Posadas

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

H

Hiram Alberto Gay

Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

S

Stephanie Pugh

Statistical Center, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA

T

Todd Matthew Morgan

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Y

Ying Xiao

CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging

J

James B. Yu

Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

J

Jeff M. Michalski

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

M

Myriam Bouchard

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

N

Neil B. Desai

Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

R

Ryan Funk

Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA - Maplewood, Maplewood, MN

K

Krisha J. Howell

Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Troy, MI

D

Donald James Jurgens

CentraCare Health System, Sartell, MN

A

Anthony C. Wong

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

X

Xinglei Shen

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

L

Lloyd Miyawaki

Marin Cancer Institute, Greenbrae, CA

B

Betty Thompson

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

S

Stephanie Greenstein Braun

Astellas, Northbrook, IL

T

Trevor Wray Johnson

Amercian College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA

F

Felix Y. Feng

P

Paul Nguyen

Department of Physics, University of Washington 2 , Seattle, Washington 98195,