A single institution retrospective study evaluating mitomycin dosing during chemoradiation in anal squamous cell carcinoma.
Abstract
7 Background: Mitomycin (MMC) is used concurrently during chemoradiation (CRT) treatment for non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA). The most effective dosing of MMC is not established, and due to concerns for tolerability, many have adopted a dose-reduction strategy. This study evaluates differences in treatment response and recurrence between MMC dosing in this setting. Methods: Demographics, age, smoking history, staging, and treatment history were collected for patients with non-metastatic SCCA treated with CRT from January 2011-September 2024 at a tertiary cancer center. Chi-square analyses compared categorical variables, and ANOVA tests were used to compare treatment response and recurrence between 3 MMC doses (12mg/m 2 x 1 dose with cap of 20mg, 10mg/m 2 x 2 doses, 10mg/m 2 x 1 dose). Results: There were 124 patients, 6 of whom were excluded due to lack of follow up. Of the 118 included, 70% were female, 16% Black, 3% Hispanic/Latino, and 58% current/former smokers. Median age was 61 years (31-98). Thirty-three (28%) pts were treated with MMC 12mg/m 2 , 71 (60%) with 10mg/m 2 x2 doses, and 14 (12%) with 10mg/m 2 x1 dose. Stage I included 18% of 12mg/m2, 7% of 10mg/m 2 x2 doses, and 7% of 10mg/m 2 x1 dose; stage II included 18% of 12mg/m2, 37% of 10mg/m 2 x2 doses, and 50% of 10mg/m 2 x1 dose; stage III included 64% of 12mg/m2, 56% of 10mg/m 2 x2 doses, and 43% of 10mg/m 2 x1 dose. A total of 39.7% were treated with MMC/capecitabine and 60.3% with MMC/fluorouracil. Complete response was achieved in 91% receiving the 12mg/m 2 , 75% receiving 10mg/m 2 x2 dose, and 71% receiving 10mg/m 2 x1 dose (p=0.13, Table 1). Using logistic regression with MMC dose, stage, age, and smoking status as independent predictors, the odds of achieving complete response were lower in 10mg/m 2 x2 doses (p=0.03) and 10mg/m 2 x1 dose (p=0.03) compared to 12mg/m 2 . Local, regional, or metastatic recurrence occurred in 15% of pts receiving 12mg/m 2 , 17% of 10mg/m 2 x2 doses, and 7% of 10mg/m 2 x1 dose. No significant difference was seen in local (p=0.52), regional (p=0.93), metastatic (p=0.87), or overall recurrence (p=0.65) between the MMC doses. Conclusions: Odds of achieving complete response was greater with 12mg/m 2 dosing. Local, regional, and metastatic recurrence were similar among the different MMC dosing cohorts. Differences in tolerance and side effects should be delineated to guide individualized dosing of MMC.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Jenny Gong
Emily Simon
University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
J. Eva Selfridge
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
David L. Bajor
Emily Steinhagen
Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
Melissa Amy Lumish
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Sakti Chakrabarti
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Amr Mohamed
Lauren E. Henke
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Jennifer Anne Dorth
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Amit Mahipal
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Madison Conces
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH