Acute skin toxicity comparison of adjuvant two-weekly accelerated hypofractionated versus three-weekly moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer: A phase 2, open label, randomized control trial.
Abstract
TPS68 Background: Moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) is the established adjuvant standard after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Subsequent trials validated further treatment acceleration, consistent with the low α/β ratio (~3 Gy). Indian phase II data using 34 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks showed acceptable ≥Grade 2 dermatitis; however, no Indian randomized study directly compares this 2-week regimen with contemporary 3-week schedules incorporating regional nodal irradiation and simultaneous integrated boost despite 33% shorter treatment duration. Methods: The study is prospective, non-stratified, randomized phase II, open labelled, enrolls women with histologically confirmed invasive carcinoma (pT0–3, pN0–2a), According to AJCC 8 th edition, following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy with negative margins. Eligible patients are ≥18 years without advanced loco-regional disease, prior malignancy, distant metastasis, prior thoracic irradiation, indication for internal mammary nodal irradiation or pregnancy. Participants are assigned 1:1 through computer-generated block (size 4 and 6) randomization with allocation concealment. Control arm: moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) as indicated and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 8 Gy in 15 fractions. Interventional arm: accelerated hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (34 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) with RNI as indicated and SIB of 8 Gy in 10 fractions. CT simulation with immobilization, ESTRO-guided target delineation, image-guided verification, and protocol-specified organ-at-risk constraints are mandated. The primary endpoint is cumulative ≥Grade 2 acute radiation dermatitis (RTOG; CTCAE v5.0) during treatment and within 3 months. Secondary endpoints include loco-regional control, Quality of life assessment (EORTC c30 and BR45) late toxicity at 6 months (RTOG; CTCAE v5.0), and dosimetric outcomes. Assuming dermatitis rates of 68% versus 32%, 64 patients provide 80% power (two-sided α=0.05); 72 will be enrolled allowing 10% attrition. Statistical analyses for primary outcome will include Chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests, Kaplan–Meier estimates with log-rank comparison, and Cox proportional hazards modelling. Secondary outcome will use Independent T test and chi square or fisher exact test. Accelerated 34 Gy/10 fractions is expected to achieve non-inferior acute toxicity, comparable early loco-regional control, and improved treatment efficiency, supporting its potential adoption in high-volume, resource-constrained oncology settings. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2024/10/074718 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Aswathi P. L.
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
Pooja Sethi
Saravanan Kandasamy
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
Swarnaditya Roy
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
Mahalakshmi T.
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India