Addition of Carboplatin to Sequential Taxane-Anthracycline Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

S Sudeep Gupta N Nita Nair (Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) R Rohini W. Hawaldar (Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India) S Shalaka Joshi S Seema Gulia T Tanuja Shet R Rajiv Sarin V Vani Parmar (Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India) S Sangeeta Desai (Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) J Jaya Ghosh T Tabassum Wadasadawala V Vaibhav Vanmali (Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India) T Tejal Panhale (Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) P Pallavi Parab A Asawari Patil (ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India) G Garvit Chitkara S Sushmita Rath J Jyoti Bajpai (Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) R Rima Pathak (Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) P Palak Popat M Meenakshi Thakur (Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India) R Rajendra A. Badwe (Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India)

Abstract

PURPOSE We evaluated the survival impact of adding platinum to standard taxane-anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS In this phase III trial, patients with TNBC were randomly assigned, after stratification by stage and menopausal status, to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising once-per-week carboplatin (AUC-2) plus paclitaxel (100 mg/m 2 ) for 8 weeks, followed by four cycles of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide, or same chemotherapy without carboplatin. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and pathologic complete response. This is the prespecified primary analysis of this study. RESULTS Of 720 patients randomly assigned between April 2010 and January 2020, 717 (platinum 361, control 356) were included in modified intention-to-treat analysis. At median follow-up of 67.6 months, in platinum and control arms, there were 111/361 and 131/356 EFS events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.03]; two-sided unstratified P = .081), with 5-year EFS of 70.7% (95% CI, 65.8% to 75.6%) and 64.1% (95% CI, 59.0% to 69.2%), respectively, and 94/361 and 121/356 deaths (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.97]; nominal P = .029), with 5-year OS of 74.4% and 66.8%, respectively. In premenopausal patients, EFS (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84]; nominal P = .003; 5-year EFS 75.0% v 59.6%) and OS (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.82]; nominal P = .002; 5-year OS 78.2% v 64.6%) were significantly higher, while in postmenopausal patients, EFS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.78]; nominal P = .386) and OS (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.61]; nominal P = .772) were not significantly different, in platinum versus control arm. There was statistically significant interaction between study intervention and menopausal status for EFS and OS, with a benefit of adding platinum in premenopausal but not in postmenopausal patients. There was more grade ≥3 myelosuppression in carboplatin arm, but there was no difference in nonhematologic toxicities. CONCLUSION Carboplatin did not significantly increase EFS but significantly increased the OS in patients with TNBC, with benefits confined to premenopausal patients.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 1
Published January 01, 2026
Pages 9-19
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (22)

S

Sudeep Gupta

N

Nita Nair

Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

R

Rohini W. Hawaldar

Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

S

Shalaka Joshi

S

Seema Gulia

T

Tanuja Shet

R

Rajiv Sarin

V

Vani Parmar

Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

S

Sangeeta Desai

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

J

Jaya Ghosh

T

Tabassum Wadasadawala

V

Vaibhav Vanmali

Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

T

Tejal Panhale

Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

P

Pallavi Parab

A

Asawari Patil

ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

G

Garvit Chitkara

S

Sushmita Rath

J

Jyoti Bajpai

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

R

Rima Pathak

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

P

Palak Popat

M

Meenakshi Thakur

Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

R

Rajendra A. Badwe

Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India