Additional efficacy and safety outcomes and an exploratory analysis of the impact of pathological complete response (pCR) on long-term outcomes from NIAGARA.
Abstract
659 Background: In the phase 3 NIAGARA study of patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), perioperative durvalumab (D) plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with NAC alone, with a manageable safety profile and no detriment to the ability to undergo radical cystectomy (RC). We report additional outcomes and an exploratory analysis from NIAGARA. Methods: NIAGARA enrolled cisplatin-eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0/1M0) planned for RC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either neoadjuvant D (1500 mg IV Q3W) and NAC (cisplatin + gemcitabine IV Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by RC, then adjuvant D monotherapy (1500 mg IV Q4W) for 8 cycles (D arm), or NAC followed by RC alone (comparator arm). Dual primary endpoints were EFS and pCR. OS was a key secondary endpoint. Metastasis-free survival and disease-specific survival were secondary endpoints. An exploratory post hoc analysis of EFS and OS in pts with pCR vs without pCR (non-pCR) was also performed. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population (data cutoff [DCO] April 2024). Results: A total of 1063 pts were randomized (533 D arm; 530 comparator arm). Pts in the D arm had a 33% reduction in risk of developing distant metastases or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83; nominal P <0.001) and 31% reduction in risk of death from bladder cancer (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52–0.91; nominal P =0.008) vs pts in the comparator arm. More pts in the D vs comparator arm had pCR at RC (37% vs 28%); pts who achieved pCR had better EFS and OS vs non-pCR. Pts in the D arm derived greater EFS and OS benefit vs the comparator arm in both pCR (EFS HR 0.58; OS HR 0.72) and non-pCR (EFS HR 0.77; OS HR 0.84) groups (Table). Overall, immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) were reported in 111/530 (21%) pts in the D arm (grade 3/4 3%) and 16/526 (3%) in the comparator arm (grade 3/4 0.2%). At DCO, all imAEs were resolved for 45/111 (41%) pts (D arm) and 7/16 (44%) pts (comparator arm). The most common imAEs were hypothyroid events (10% D arm; 1% comparator arm) and hyperthyroid events (3% D arm; 0.8% comparator arm). Conclusions: Perioperative D with NAC reduced the risk of developing metastases and death from bladder cancer, and exploratory post hoc analyses showed that D improved EFS and OS in both pCR and non-pCR groups. imAEs were consistent with the known profile of D and mostly low grade. These data further support perioperative D as a potential new standard treatment for pts with MIBC. Funding: AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT03732677 . pCR Non-pCR D N=199 Comparator N=146 HR (95% CI) D N=334 Comparator N=384 HR (95% CI) 24-month EFS rate (95% CI), % 92 (87–95) 86 (79–91) 0.58 (0.33–1.00) 53 (48–59) 50 (44–55) 0.77 (0.63–0.95) 24-month OS rate (95% CI), % 96 (92–98) 91 (85–95) 0.72 (0.37–1.43) 74 (69–79) 69 (64–73) 0.84 (0.66–1.07)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Matthew D. Galsky
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
James W.F. Catto
Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
Joshua J Meeks
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Hiroyuki Nishiyama
University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Alexandra Drakaki
Toan Quang Vu
Department of Internal Medicine 3, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Ha Noi, Viet Nam
Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
Vagif Atduev
Volga District Medical Center, Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Ariel Galapo Kann
Clinical Oncology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
Tae-Hwan Kim
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) , , 77 CheongamRo , , ,
Albert Font Pous
Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Chao-Hsiang Chang
Ronald de Wit
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Marek Z. Wojtukiewicz
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Center, Bialystok, Poland
Wenjing Xin
AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
Sarah E. Donegan
Global Medicines Development, Oncology Research and Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
Stephan Hois
AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
Thomas Powles
Department of Medical Oncology Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK