Amivantamab for recurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma: A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial.
Abstract
6101 Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare salivary gland cancer with heterogenous clinical behavior. ACC typically presents with locoregional disease and is treated with curative intent surgery and adjuvant radiation, but many patients develop locally recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease even years later. Two recognized molecular subtypes exist: ACC 1 (37%), characterized by MYC amplification and NOTCH -activating mutations and a poor prognosis, and ACC 2 (63%), which demonstrates P63 expression and upregulated EGFR and MET and a better prognosis. There is no standard treatment for R/M ACC, but multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors are a mainstay of treatment despite their limited efficacy. Amivantamab is a bispecific antibody that binds to the extracellular domains of EGFR and MET, causing immune-directed destruction of cancer cells. Since MET expression renders EGFR inhibitors ineffective, we hypothesized that amivantamab would overcome resistance especially in the ACC 2 subtype. This multicenter, single arm, Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT05074940) evaluated the efficacy of amivantamab in patients with R/M ACC supported by Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with R/M ACC and had progressive disease (PD) within 6 months of enrollment, ECOG ≤1, with adequate organ and marrow function. Patients received amivantamab 1050 mg or 1400 mg (≥80kg) IV weekly for 4 weeks then Q2 weeks until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST 1.1. Among 18 treated patients the lower limit of a one-sided 90% exact binomial CI would be >14% if ≥5 patients respond. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by CTCAE v5. Secondary end points included progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Key exploratory end points were P63 and MYC expression. Results: We enrolled 21 patients with 17 evaluable for response at time of submission. Most were male (14, 67%) non-Hispanic (20, 95%), and White (19, 90%) with a median age of 61 (range, 36-76) years. The majority received prior treatment. The best ORR was 6% (1 partial response), while 9 (53%) had stable disease (SD) and 7 (41%) PD. Median duration of SD was 5.4 months. The most common treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were acneiform rash (17, 81%), infusion related reaction (16, 76%), and fatigue (15,71%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3 patients (14%) including acneiform rash, oral mucositis, and elevated alkaline phosphatase with no Grade ≥4 TRAEs. Median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% CI, 1.84-7.64) and 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.48-NR), respectively. There was no correlation between tumor P63 or MYC levels and clinical benefit (PR+SD). Conclusions: While amivantamab did not achieve the target ORR, the safety profile was manageable and clinical benefit was observed in 59% of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05074940 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (13)
Olga Zamulko
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Glenn J. Hanna
Douglas Adkins
Robert Ebert and Greg Stubblefield Head and Neck Tumor Center at Washington University School of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, and Barnes–Jewish Hospital, St. Louis
Jianmin Pan
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
Audrey Romano
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Maria Lehn
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
Allison Forsythe
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Casey L. Allen
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Kathryn A. Wikenheiser-Brokamp
Christopher Lemmon
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Dalia El-Gamal
Shesh Rai
1University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
Trisha Michel Wise-Draper
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH