Are long-term remissions possible with hormonal therapy only? Post hoc analysis of EMBARK examining sustained prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/mL despite testosterone (T) recovery after treatment (tx) suspension.
Abstract
189 Background: The phase 3 EMBARK trial (NCT02319837) assessed enzalutamide plus leuprolide (enza combo), leuprolide alone (LA), and enzalutamide monotherapy (enza mono) in patients (pts) with prostate cancer and high-risk biochemical recurrence. EMBARK demonstrated significant improvements for metastasis-free survival (enza combo and enza mono) and overall survival (enza combo). A key feature of EMBARK was tx suspension after 37 weeks in pts with PSA <0.2 ng/mL. We assessed the proportion of pts with sustained PSA <0.2 ng/mL despite T recovery. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive enza combo, LA, or enza mono. Pts received tx for 36 weeks. This post hoc analysis evaluated proportions of pts with PSA <0.2 ng/mL and T recovery to baseline, 175 ng/dL, or 250 ng/dL after tx suspension of 12, 24, or 36 months. Results: During the entire 36 months after tx suspension, 9.3%, 3.4%, and 2.3% of pts in the enza combo (n=353), LA (n=354), and enza mono groups (n=354), respectively, maintained PSA <0.2 ng/mL; proportions during 12 and 24 months are shown (Table). During 36 months after tx suspension, among pts in the enza combo, LA, and enza mono groups, respectively, 3.7%, 1.4%, and 1.1% maintained PSA <0.2 ng/mL and achieved T recovery to >250 ng/dL. Results for T recovery to baseline and >175 ng/dL are shown (Table). Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 25 pts treated with enza combo for 9 months had PSA <0.2 ng/mL and normal T 3 years post therapy, demonstrating long-term “remissions” are possible after only 9 months of enza combo. Rates with LA and enza mono were not zero but were much lower than with enza combo (both 1%, vs 4% with enza combo). Clinical trial information: NCT02319837 . Pts with PSA <0.2 ng/mL and T recovery after tx suspension (safety population). 12 months 24 months 36 months Enza combo (n=353) LA (n=354) Enza mono (n=354) Enza combo (n=353) LA (n=354) Enza mono (n=354) Enza combo (n=353) LA (n=354) Enza mono (n=354) Pts with PSA <0.2 ng/mL during suspension, n (%) 127 (36.0) 53 (15.0) 33 (9.3) 58 (16.4) 24 (6.8) 15 (4.2) 33 (9.3) 12 (3.4) 8 (2.3) T >175 ng/dL † , n (%) 72 (20.4) 33 (9.3) 29 (8.2) 35 (9.9) 17 (4.8) 12 (3.4) 15 (4.2) 8 (2.3) 5 (1.4) T >250 ng/dL ‡ , n (%) 44 (12.5) 21 (5.9) 23 (6.5) 25 (7.1) 15 (4.2) 10 (2.8) 13 (3.7) 5 (1.4) 4 (1.1) T ≥baseline § , n (%) 21 (5.9) 11 (3.1) 18 (5.1) 16 (4.5) 10 (2.8) 10 (2.8) 9 (2.5) 3 (0.8) 4 (1.1) No T assessment, n (%) 6 (1.7) 5 (1.4) 2 (0.6) 8 (2.3) 3 (0.8) 1 (0.3) 5 (1.4) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3) Data cutoff: January 31, 2023. The denominator for all percentages is the number of pts in the safety population. † T assessment at 12, 24, or 36 months ± 6-week window of recovery to >175 ng/dL. ‡ T assessment at 12, 24, or 36 months ± 6-week window of recovery to >250 ng/dL. § T assessment at 12, 24, or 36 months ± 6-week window of recovery to ≥baseline T.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Neal D. Shore
START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
Ugo De Giorgi
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
Martin Gleave
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Matko Kalac
Oncology Division, Pfizer, New York
Yiyun Tang
Oncology Division, Pfizer, South San Francisco, CA
Ruslan Croitoru
Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL
Matt Rosales
Oncology Global Development, Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL
Manish Patel
Antonio Finelli
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Zvi Schiffman
Houston Metro Urology, Houston, TX
Anna Lantz
Stephen J. Freedland
Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles