Assessing the impact of cardiovascular disease and ADT on survival disparities in prostate cancer.
Abstract
268 Background: US Black men are on average diagnosed with more aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) and have higher mortality than White men. Studies in predominantly White populations show that PCa patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic syndrome (MetS), or prior CVD events face increased risk for further CVD and cardiotoxicity during/after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, racial disparities in this context are underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of race, ADT use, and CVD on overall survival (OS) following radiation therapy (RT) for PCa, assessing disparities by stage and demographics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a single institution prostate cancer database to identify patients with PCa who received IMRT or brachytherapy RT as their initial treatment between 2003 and 2023. Within each AJCC stage (I,II,III or IV), we compared OS curves by ADT use (any vs. none) and race, and by CVD (present vs. absent), and race using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess interactions and additionally adjust for age and substage (e.g. IIA vs IIB). Age was modeled as time-varying in stage II due to assumption violations. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests compared baseline characteristics and CVD by race and ADT use. Results: Of 4,247 eligible patients (Black and White), 17% were Black, and 32% received ADT. Black patients were younger at diagnosis (mean 63.4 vs. 67.7 years, p<0.0001) and at more advance stage at diagnosis (Trend p=0.02). CVD affected 49% of patients, with no racial difference (p=0.48). ADT use increased by stage (5% to 85%), with no racial differences within stages (p>0.1). Median follow-up from end of RT to death or last follow-up was 85.4 months (IQR=43.5-139.8), with no difference by race (p=0.63). Among ADT patients, CVD was significantly associated with reduced OS in stage II (p = 0.02) and marginally in stage IV (p = 0.08). Age consistently predicted higher mortality across stages. CVD linked to increased mortality in stage I (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09–1.70, p=0.006), but not in later stages. Race was not independently associated with mortality. However, one significant interaction was found: In stage III only, ADT’s effect on survival differed by race. Among Black men, all deaths occurred in the ADT group (24/84) vs. none in the no-ADT group (0/9), HR was undefined; in contrast, among White men, OS was not associated with ADT, HR was 1.09 (95% CI 0.64–1.85). Conclusions: In this large, diverse cohort, CVD was common and linked to worse survival in early-stage PCa, especially in stage II ADT patients. Race did not independently predict mortality. ADT’s impact on survival did not differ significantly by race except in stage III, but interpretation was limited. CVD assessment in early stage PCa and larger studies to clarify ADT’s role in racial disparities in survival is needed.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Camille Ragin
Karen Ruth
1Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Hospital System, Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Zhongxuan He
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Eric M. Horwitz
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Daniel Edmundowicz
Temple, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Karthik Devarajan
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Shannon M. Lynch
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Dania Turner
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Sharon Harrison
Denise Gibbs
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA
Pamela Turner
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Elizabeth R. Plimack
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
David Chen
Robert Uzzo
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Alexander Kutikov
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Matthew R. Zibelman
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Daniel M. Geynisman
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...