Association of immune-mediated hepatitis with immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Abstract
e16200 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard for unresectable/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) remains a clinically relevant toxicity in patients with underlying liver disease. Prior safety analyses often pool heterogeneous tumor types or report nonspecific transaminase elevations, limiting HCC- and regimen-specific risk estimation. We evaluated IMH across contemporary ICI regimens in advanced HCC. Methods: Phase II–III trials and relevant meta-analyses of ICI-containing regimens in unresectable/advanced HCC were reviewed. IMH was defined as trial-reported immune-related hepatitis or hepatic adverse events of special interest managed under immune-toxicity frameworks (when specified). Outcomes included any-grade and grade ≥3 IMH, corticosteroid use, treatment discontinuation, and fatal IMH. Regimens were categorized as ICI monotherapy, dual immune checkpoint blockade (IO–IO), or ICI plus anti-VEGF or tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (IO–VEGF/IO–TKI). Results: Across meta-analyses focused on primary liver cancers, pooled IMH incidence was ~2.0% (any grade) and ~1.3% (grade ≥3). Trial-level immune-hepatic toxicity reporting was most detailed for IO–IO and IO–VEGF/IO–TKI regimens. In HIMALAYA (STRIDE; IO–IO; n = 388), IMH occurred in 7.5%, with grade ≥3 events in 4.4%; corticosteroids were required in reported IMH cases, 2.3% discontinued therapy, and 0.8% experienced fatal IMH. Additional first-line trials informing regimen-class risk included IO–IO (CheckMate 9DW), IO–VEGF (IMbrave150; ORIENT-32; camrelizumab plus rivoceranib), IO–TKI (COSMIC-312; LEAP-002), and ICI monotherapy (CheckMate 459; RATIONALE-301; KEYNOTE studies). Overall patterns suggest higher IMH risk with IO–IO, intermediate risk with IO–VEGF/IO–TKI, and lower risk with monotherapy; however, cross-trial comparisons are limited by heterogeneity in immune attribution. Conclusions: IMH risk in advanced HCC appears regimen-class dependent, with the most clinically significant signal observed with dual checkpoint blockade. Standardized reporting of immune-attributed hepatic events is needed to support actionable risk stratification. Immune-mediated hepatitis across ICI regimens in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Regimen Key trials Any-grade IMH (%) Grade ≥3 IMH (%) Notes IO–IO HIMALAYA; CheckMate 9DW 7.5 / NR 4.4 / NR Steroids; 2.3% d/c; 0.8% fatal IO–VEGF IMbrave150; ORIENT-32; camrelizumab+rivoceranib NR NR Immune attribution variable IO–TKI COSMIC-312; LEAP-002 NR NR IMH not consistently separated ICI mono CheckMate 459; RATIONALE-301 Low Low Lower immune-hepatic toxicity Abbreviations: IMH = immune-mediated hepatitis; IO–IO = dual immune checkpoint blockade; IO–VEGF = ICI + anti-VEGF; IO–TKI = ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NR = not reported; d/c = discontinuation.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Himanshu Khangwal
North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India
Neha Pillai Vinod
SRM Medical College and Research Center, Chennai, India
Purvy Manhari Ravula
Mamata Medical College, Khammam, India
Vaishnavi Kandukuri
Harnett Health Systems Inc., Dunn, NC
Yuktha Sridhar
J.J.M Medical College, Davangere, India
Daisha Rathod
Osmania medical college, Hyderabad, India
Sweta Sahu
J.J.M. Medical College, Davangere, India
Pooja Gogia Bhasin
4West Virginia University Cancer Insitute, Morgantown, United States