Association of non-luminal subtype with overall survival in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: Biomarker results from the Bladder Cancer Prognosis Programme.
Abstract
843 Background: High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is associated with substantial progression and recurrence rates. Some patients with HR-NMIBC will die from their disease, and aggressive tumors could be treated earlier with radical cystectomy (RC). Previous work revealed higher rates of pathological upstaging at RC for NMIBC with a non-luminal molecular subtype. Methods: The Decipher Bladder genomic subtyping classifier (GSC; Veracyte, San Diego, CA, USA) was performed on bladder TURBT specimens from HR-NMIBC patients included in the prospectively followed Bladder Cancer Prognosis Programme (BCPP) registry (University of Birmingham, UK). GSC, a classifier originally developed for MIBC were evaluated for the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazards analysis. Subgroup analyses included very high-risk NMIBC (VHR-NMIBC) as categorized by the 2025 Guidelines on NMIBC by the European Association of Urology (EAU). Results: A total of 259 HR-NMIBC patients were analyzed of which 67 patients (26%) were stage Ta and 192 patents were stage T1 (74%). 83 patients (32%) died. The median follow-up time for censored patients was 5.2 years (IQR 4.1-5.9 years). Molecular subtyping identified 219 luminal and 40 non-luminal tumors. Comparing luminal and non-luminal HR-NMIBC we found no significant differences for patient age and sex, whereas cT1 disease was significantly more present among non-luminal disease (p=0.007). Patients with non-luminal tumors had worse OS with 22 (55%) deaths in patients with non-luminal tumors and 61 (28%) deaths in patients with luminal tumors, corresponding to 5-year OS estimates of 44% for non-luminal and 72% for luminal HR-NMIBC. Multivariable analyses (MVA) revealed a significant association between molecular tumor subtype and OS after adjusting for baseline clinical variables (HR: 1.91 [95% CI; 1.16 - 3.15], p=0.01). Application of the EAU 2025 guidelines revealed 56 patients (22%) were classified as very-high risk. Among these, non-luminal subtype at baseline was significantly associated with OS on MVA (HR 2.55 [95% CI; 1.08 – 6.00], p=0.03). Conclusions: Non-luminal tumors at initial presentation harbor more aggressive disease among HR-NMIBC, reflected by worse OS on long-term follow-up as compared to luminal tumors.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (13)
Joep Jacobus de Jong
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Roland Arnold
Anshita Goel
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Benjamin Tura
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Hyunnam Monica Ryu
Veracyte, Inc., San Francisco, CA
James A. Proudfoot
Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA
Elai Davicioni
Ben Abbotts
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Maurice Zeegers
Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Kk Cheng
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Nicholas David James
The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Douglas G. Ward
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Richard T. Bryan
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom