Association of prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (DT) and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) findings in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR).
Abstract
33 Background: Historically, PSA DT can be prognostic for metastasis free survival in BCR (as defined on computed tomography (CT) and bone scan). PSA DT is also an important tool in risk stratification in BCR to identify which patients (pts) require therapy (e.g. pts with a PSA DT>6 months). The emerging use of PSMA imaging creates another tool to assess BCR pts, but there is no data on the association of PSA DT and PSMA findings. Methods: NCT05588128 enrolls BCR pts after definitive +/- salvage therapies. Pts must have a PSA>0.5 ng/ml, testosterone >100 ng/dL, and negative CT/bone scans. Lymph nodes (LNs) up to 1.5 cm and prior therapies are permitted. All patients undergo a baseline PSMA PET scan, along with measurement of PSA and PSA DT. Here we describe the relationship between baseline PSA metrics and baseline PSMA imaging findings in patients with BCR. Results: 130 patients are currently evaluable with a median age= 71 years, baseline PSA of 1.95 ng/dL (range: 0.5 to 71) and PSA DT of 10.6 months (range 1.2 to 132) off therapy. Of all participants, 16.9% (n=22) had findings limited to the prostate bed and 34.6% (n=45) had PSMA+ avidity in the prostate bed with other findings. 42.3% (n=55) had PSMA + LNs, and 13.8% (n=18) had PSMA+ bone lesions. Four patients had serosal deposits with PSMA avidity, and one patient had a PSMA+ lung nodule. Conclusions: These data are the first to compare PSMA imaging results with corresponding PSA levels and PSA DT in a large cohort of patients with BCR. Results show that pts with historically favorable/long PSA DT may have high volume/bone+ findings on PSMA. There is no data to suggest treatment escalation is required in BCR pts with high volume PSMA findings, but long/favorable PSA DT. These results highlight the caveats of using PSMA imaging alone to drive treatment decisions in BCR without further data for how baseline PSMA imaging corresponds with long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT05588128 . PSMA PET+ lesion locations by PSA doubling time in patients with BCR prostate cancer (total n=130). PSA DT # Pts Median PSA PSMA Neg Prostate+ only Lymph Nodes+ ≥ 4 Lymph Nodes+ Bone+ ≥12 mo 52 3.55 9 (17.3%) 16 (30.8%) 24 (46.2%) 12 (23%) 6 (11.5%) 9 to <12 mo 20 1.56 2 (10%) 4 (20%) 11 (55%) 3 (15%) 3 (15%) 6 to <9 mo 17 0.9 5 (29.4%) 0 (0%) 12 (70%) 8 (47.1%) 2 (11.8*) <6 mo 41 2.1 5 (12.2%) 2 (4.9%) 28 (68.3) 15 (36.6) 7 (17.1)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Melissa Lauren Abel
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Esther Mena
1National Cancer Institute, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Bethesda, United States
Liza Lindenberg
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Megan Hausler
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Katherine Lee-Wisdom
Monique Williams
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Amy Hankin
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching
Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA
Laura A. Sena
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Russell Kent Pachynski
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Edwin Melencio Posadas
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
Helen Moon
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Marijo Bilusic
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Catherine Handy Marshall
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Deborah Jolissaint
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
Gregory T. Chesnut
The Center for Prostate Disease Research/Walter Reed, Bethesda, MD
William Douglas Figg
Fatima Karzai
Peter Choyke
2Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Center for Cancer Research, NIH, Bethesda, United States
Ravi Amrit Madan
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD