Association of urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation with Nectin-4 expression and outcomes with enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment.

J Jonas Saal (University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany) N Niklas Klümper S Stefanie Zschaebitz (National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany) T Thomas Büttner F Florian Roghmann (Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany) D Dora Niedersuess-Beke F Friedemann Zengerling R Richard Cathomas (6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland) J Joshua J. Meeks (Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL) G Guenter Niegisch (Department of Urology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University; Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) M Marieta Toma O Oliver Hahn K Kerstin Junker (Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany) J Jozefina Casuscelli S Steffen Rausch K Katrin Schlack (Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center Muenster (WTZ), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany) A Arndt Hartmann (Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen) M Michael Hölzel V Viktor Grünwald M Markus Eckstein (Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

865 Background: The Nectin-4 directed antibody-drug conjugate EV has demonstrated high efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), but outcomes in patients with divergent histologies remain poorly characterized. Squamous differentiation represents a clinically challenging subtype with distinct molecular features. We investigated Nectin-4 expression patterns and EV clinical outcomes in patients with urothelial cancer with squamous differentiation versus non-otherwise specified (NOS) histology. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients with mUC (squamous differentiation vs NOS urothelial carcinoma) treated with EV as standard-of-care across multiple centers. NECTIN4 gene amplification was assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and membranous Nectin-4 protein by immunohistochemistry H-scores. Outcomes including ORR, PFS, and OS were documented by the investigators. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Among 127 evaluable patients, those with squamous histology (n = 23; 18%) demonstrated significantly lower membranous Nectin-4 expression with a median H-score of 20 (IQR 3.5–85) vs 210 (IQR 97.5–290), p < 0.001. NECTIN4 gene amplification frequency was higher in squamous compared to NOS histology (n = 104): 7.7% vs 34% (p < 0.001). Importantly, patients with squamous histology exhibited inferior clinical outcomes to EV: ORR was lower (20.0% vs 51.6%, p = 0.02), median PFS was 2.8 months vs 6.2 months (HR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.45–4.37, p = 0.001), and median OS was 6.5 months vs 13 months (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.26–4.49, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Squamous differentiation in advanced urothelial carcinoma is associated with significantly lower membranous Nectin-4 expression and NECTIN4 amplification frequency, corresponding to markedly inferior responses to EV. These findings highlight the critical need for alternative therapeutic targets and novel treatment strategies in this population.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 865-865
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Jonas Saal

University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

N

Niklas Klümper

S

Stefanie Zschaebitz

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

T

Thomas Büttner

F

Florian Roghmann

Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany

D

Dora Niedersuess-Beke

F

Friedemann Zengerling

R

Richard Cathomas

6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland

J

Joshua J. Meeks

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

G

Guenter Niegisch

Department of Urology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University; Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

M

Marieta Toma

O

Oliver Hahn

K

Kerstin Junker

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

J

Jozefina Casuscelli

S

Steffen Rausch

K

Katrin Schlack

Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center Muenster (WTZ), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany

A

Arndt Hartmann

Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

M

Michael Hölzel

V

Viktor Grünwald

M

Markus Eckstein

Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany