Avelumab (Ave) in combination with other anticancer agents as first-line maintenance (1LM) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Primary analysis from the JAVELIN Bladder Medley phase 2 trial.
Abstract
739 Background: Ave 1LM is a recommended treatment option for patients (pts) with aUC without progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). In the interim analysis of the JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial (NCT05327530), 1LM with Ave + sacituzumab govitecan (SG; Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate) improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs Ave monotherapy (mono), thereby meeting the study’s primary endpoint. Here, we report the primary analysis in all study arms, including Ave + SG, Ave + M6223 (anti-TIGIT), and Ave + NKTR-255 (polymer-conjugated IL-15 agonist). Methods: Pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC without progression after 4-6 cycles of 1L PBC were randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive Ave mono (control), Ave + SG, Ave + M6223, or Ave + NKTR-255, stratified by presence of visceral metastases. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and safety. Per protocol, PFS and overall survival (OS) data in the Ave mono arm for each comparison were extended using propensity score–weighted data from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial (NCT02603432), which was additionally down-weighted to match the number of randomized pts. Results: 256 pts were randomized. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between arms. At data cutoff (Apr 28, 2025), median follow-up for OS was ≥16.8 months in all arms. Study treatment was ongoing in the Ave + SG, Ave + M6223, Ave + NKTR-255, and Ave mono arms in 20/74 (27.0%), 17/72 (23.6%), 22/73 (30.1%), and 8/37 (21.6%) pts, respectively. In the Ave + SG, Ave + M6223, Ave + NKTR-255, and Ave mono arms, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade (grade ≥3) occurred in 97.3% (71.2%), 76.4% (8.3%), 95.8% (20.8%), and 66.7% (5.6%) of pts, respectively. 2 pts had a TRAE that led to death (Ave + SG and Ave + NKTR-255 arms). PFS and OS results (including extended data in the Ave mono arm) are shown in the Table. Conclusions: In the primary analysis of the JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial, Ave + SG as 1LM in pts with aUC without progression after 1L PBC showed improved PFS vs Ave mono. While OS data are still immature, OS trends favored Ave + SG, Ave + M6223, and Ave + NKTR-255 vs Ave mono. No new safety signals were identified. Follow-up for OS is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05327530 . Ave + SG (n=74) Ave mono (n=74) Ave + M6223 (n=72) Ave mono (n=74) Ave + NKTR-255 (n=73) Ave mono (n=74) Median PFS (95% CI), months 11.17(7.62-17.64) 3.75(3.32-5.65) 5.42(3.78-7.43) 4.50(3.45-7.20) 5.59(3.75-12.91) 4.50(3.48-7.20) Stratified HR (95% CI) 0.54(0.36-0.81) 0.95(0.64-1.39) 0.81(0.55-1.21) Median OS (95% CI), months NE(18.37-NE) 22.05(16.92-28.78) NE(19.45-NE) 23.23(17.68-30.82) NE(19.19-NE) 23.23(17.08-30.82) Stratified HR (95% CI) 0.69(0.41-1.17) 0.75(0.44-1.27) 0.67(0.39-1.14) HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Jeannie Hoffman-Censits
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Marinos Tsiatas
Athens Medical Center, Marousi, Greece
Peter Mu-Hsin Chang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and Institute of Biopharmaceutical Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Miso Kim
Department of Mechanical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea
Flora Zagouri
Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
Sang Joon Shin
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea
Se Hyun Kim
Harvey Yu-Li Su
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
José Ángel Arranz Arija
Jose Pablo Maroto-Rey
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
Marco Maruzzo
Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)–IRCCS, Padua, Italy
Rosa Tambaro
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
Normand Blais
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
Sylvie Rottey
Georgios Gakis
Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Astrid Schneider
The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Karin Tyroller
EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA
Natalia Jacob
The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Begoña P. Valderrama
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain