Cabozantinib in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.

N Nikolaos Trikalinos (Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO) R Rama Suresh (Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO) K Katrina Sophia Pedersen (Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN) B Belal Firwana (Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, St Louis, MO) M Melissa A. Reimers (Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) P Paul Tracy Mehan (Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO) A Anjali Rohatgi (Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) E Esther Lu (Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Biostatistics, St. Louis, MO) O Olive Pressey (Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) N Nicholas Waldron (Division of Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO) S Shuang Wu B Benjamin R. Tan (Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO)

Abstract

4183 Background: High grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs) are treated with platinum doublets mirroring guidelines for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) but recurrences are common and salvage options are limited in efficacy. Cabozantinib (CABO), an inhibitor of VEGFR, MET, and TAM kinases (TYRO3, AXL, and MER) was approved by the FDA for treatment of well differentiated (WD) NENs of both pancreatic and extrapancreatic origins based on the CABINET study (Chan, NEJM 2025). However, its efficacy in the whole spectrum of HG-NEN patients including poorly differentiated disease (PDD) has not been prospectively explored. Methods: This was a single institution, Phase II study of CABO in patients with HG-NENs who had progressed on at least one prior treatment. Key inclusion/exclusion criteria were NENs of any origin except SCLC, high grade by Ki-67 of > 20% or histology consensus, ECOG of < = 1, appropriate hematological parameters and no history of bleeding or active cardiac disease. CABO was given orally starting at 60 mg po daily in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint of this study was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A Simon optimal 2-stage design tested the null hypothesis that the true ORR is < = 1% at the type I error rate of 5%, resulting in projected enrollment of up to 32 total patients. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v5.0 and response was evaluated according to RECIST v1. Results: All patients have been accrued, with 4/32 patients still on treatment. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years and male to female ratio was 1.46. Origin of tumor was GI in 68.8% of the cases, the rest being thoracic (6.3%), prostate (6.3%) cervical (6.3%) head/neck (3.1%) and unknown (9.4%). Median Ki-67 was 55%, 11 patients had Ki-67 > 70%. Histology was WD-HG in 40% of patients and PDD in 60%. Two patients had mixed PDD/other components (MiNEN). Median PFS in evaluable patients was 4.01 months [95% CI 1.61 to 9.30] and mOS was 9.89 mo [95% CI 6.73 to 18.96]. Three patients so far (9.3%) have had partial response as best response (PDD-colon, WD-pancreas and PDD-cervical) while 19/32 (59.4%) patients have had stable disease as best response so far (disease control rate 68.8%). Five (15.6%) patients have received more than 10 treatment cycles. The three longest treated patients had WD-pancreas (23 and 17 cycles) and PDD-unknown (12 cycles). One patient had eventual resection of a metastatic site and is currently without evidence of disease. Three patients withdrew from the trial because of toxicities (shortness of breath, GI bleeding, thromboembolism). Twenty-six patients have expired. Conclusions: CABO monotherapy showed efficacy in some HG-NEN patients with not just WD but also the very aggressive PDD histology. No new side effects to the ones previously described for this agent were noted. Supported by Exelixis and a Siteman investment program grant. Clinical trial information: NCT04412629 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4183-4183
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

N

Nikolaos Trikalinos

Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO

R

Rama Suresh

Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO

K

Katrina Sophia Pedersen

Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN

B

Belal Firwana

Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, St Louis, MO

M

Melissa A. Reimers

Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

P

Paul Tracy Mehan

Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

A

Anjali Rohatgi

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

E

Esther Lu

Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Biostatistics, St. Louis, MO

O

Olive Pressey

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

N

Nicholas Waldron

Division of Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO

S

Shuang Wu

B

Benjamin R. Tan

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO