Cavity‐Engineered Polycrystalline Cathodes Resolve Stress Concentration Problem in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

T Tianpeng Huang (Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao China) Y Yue Zheng (State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University) J Jun Ma S Shu Zhang F Fu Sun (Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology) K Kejian Wang M Markus Osenberg (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany) A André Hilger H Henning Markötter (Department of Non‐Destructive Testing Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und ‐Prüfung Berlin Germany) I Ingo Manke (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, Berlin 14109, Germany) F Fabian Wilde (Institute of Materials Physics Helmholtz‐Zentrum Hereon Geesthacht Germany) Z Zhiwei Hu (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nothnitzer Strasse 40, Dresden 01187, Germany) X Xiaoyu Shen C Chang‐Yang Kuo (National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China) C Chien‐Te Chen (National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China) X Xiaogang Wang P Pengxian Han (Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao 266101 China) S Su‐Yang Hsu (National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan) J Jin‐Ming Chen (Department of Electrophysics National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan) S Shanmu Dong (Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology) G Guanglei Cui (Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The development of all‐solid‐state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) has pushed beyond the energy density limit of conventional liquid systems. However, stress concentration remains a critical yet poorly understood cause of degradation in ASSLMBs, particularly in widely used polycrystalline (PC) Ni‐rich cathode systems. Herein, we design cavity‐contained PC LiNi 0.9 Co 0.05 Mn 0.05 O 2 (NCM) cathode particles to resolve the stress concentration problem in particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale by bottom‐up stress management. Synchrotron x‐ray tomography and multiscale finite element simulations disclose the cathode reaction heterogeneity initiates stress concentration and particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale mechanical‐electrochemical degradation. Compared to cavity‐free and multi‐cavity NCM, central‐cavity NCM suppressed cracking within the particles through shortened ionic transport distances and a built‐in stress‐relief space, enhanced (de)lithiation depth and uniformity at the cathode, reduced porosity and fracture in the electrolyte, and inhibited lithium dendrite formation at the anode, suggesting significantly improved stress uniformity in particle‐electrode‐battery levels. Consequently, ASSLMBs using the central‐cavity NCM deliver a superior cycling stability (86.4% after 200 cycles and 81.5% after 400 cycles), outperforming both the traditional cavity‐free NCM (51.6% after 200 cycles) and highly anticipated single crystal NCM (44.2% after 400 cycles). This work links particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale mechanical‐electrochemical behavior, providing valuable insights for designing ASSLMBs with long lifespan from a holistic perspective.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 24
Published April 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (21)

T

Tianpeng Huang

Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao China

Y

Yue Zheng

State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University

J

Jun Ma

S

Shu Zhang

F

Fu Sun

Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology

K

Kejian Wang

M

Markus Osenberg

Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany

A

André Hilger

H

Henning Markötter

Department of Non‐Destructive Testing Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und ‐Prüfung Berlin Germany

I

Ingo Manke

Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, Berlin 14109, Germany

F

Fabian Wilde

Institute of Materials Physics Helmholtz‐Zentrum Hereon Geesthacht Germany

Z

Zhiwei Hu

Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nothnitzer Strasse 40, Dresden 01187, Germany

X

Xiaoyu Shen

C

Chang‐Yang Kuo

National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China

C

Chien‐Te Chen

National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China

X

Xiaogang Wang

P

Pengxian Han

Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao 266101 China

S

Su‐Yang Hsu

National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan

J

Jin‐Ming Chen

Department of Electrophysics National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan

S

Shanmu Dong

Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology

G

Guanglei Cui

Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology