Cell cycle-coupled transcriptional network regulates human B cell fate bifurcation 2257411

N Nicholas Pease (University of Pittsburgh) J Jingyu Fan (University of Pittsburgh) S Swapnil Keshari J Jered Stratton (University of Pittsburgh) S Steven Gierlack (University of Pittsburgh) L Luis Mena Hernandez (University of Pittsburgh) P Peter Gerges (University of Pittsburgh) B Betsy Ann Varghese N Narayanan Nampoothiri VP (University of Pittsburgh) C Christopher McGinnnis (Stanford University) Z Zarifeh Heidari Rarani (University of Pittsburgh) A Akanksha Sachan (University of Pittsburgh) C Camila Macedo G Godhev Manakkat Vijay (University of Pittsburgh) W Wenxi Zhang T Tanush Swaminathan (University of Pittsburgh) A Abhinav Jain A Ansuman Satpathy (Stanford University) D Diana Metes (University of Pittsburgh) W Wayne Stallaert N Nidhi Sahni J Jishnu Das H Harinder Singh (University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Antibody response quality and durability depend on activated B cells bifurcating into plasmablast (PB) or germinal center B cell (GCBC) fates. PBs are short-lived and secrete low-affinity antibodies, whereas GCBCs undergo somatic hypermutation and selection before potentially generating long-lived plasma cells that produce high-affinity antibodies. The gene regulatory networks (GRNs) governing these trajectories in human B cells remain poorly defined. Methods We profiled in vitro—activated human B cells using time-series single-cell multi-omics (RNA/ATAC-seq) and applied machine learning to predict linkages between transcription factors (TFs), cis-regulatory elements, and target genes, building B cell state-specific GRNs. Using these GRNs, we simulated TF perturbations and tested the predicted effects using CRISPR screening in primary B cells. Results Simulations and experiments converged with predictions of TF activity at single-nucleotide resolution, revealing dominant and reciprocal actions of IRF4 and partners at IRF-related motifs. Single-cell perturbation analysis uncovered a reciprocal negative feedback loop that modulated B cell fate choice, involving BATF, IRF4 and BLIMP1. Additionally, we found that IRF4 and BLIMP1 co-repressed the cell cycle regulator MYC before PB differentiation. G0 lengthening accelerated the switch to a IRF4hi/BLIMP1hi state and enhanced the probability of PB specification, thereby generating a self-reinforcing regulatory module that couples cell cycle dynamics to B cell fate choice. Conclusion This work establishes a generalizable framework for assembling and testing GRNs in the context of immune cell fate decisions. Applying this approach to human B cells revealed previously unreported feedback loops that link cell division to fate specification. These findings have implications for strategies to modulate antibody responses in humans. Funding Source Cancer Research Institute (#4185) ; NIAID (#5T32AI089443) Topic Categories Immune Response Regulation: Molecular Mechanisms (IRM)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 215, Issue Supplement_1
Published August 01, 2026
ISSN 0022-1767
Publisher American Association of Immunologists

Authors (23)

N

Nicholas Pease

University of Pittsburgh

J

Jingyu Fan

University of Pittsburgh

S

Swapnil Keshari

J

Jered Stratton

University of Pittsburgh

S

Steven Gierlack

University of Pittsburgh

L

Luis Mena Hernandez

University of Pittsburgh

P

Peter Gerges

University of Pittsburgh

B

Betsy Ann Varghese

N

Narayanan Nampoothiri VP

University of Pittsburgh

C

Christopher McGinnnis

Stanford University

Z

Zarifeh Heidari Rarani

University of Pittsburgh

A

Akanksha Sachan

University of Pittsburgh

C

Camila Macedo

G

Godhev Manakkat Vijay

University of Pittsburgh

W

Wenxi Zhang

T

Tanush Swaminathan

University of Pittsburgh

A

Abhinav Jain

A

Ansuman Satpathy

Stanford University

D

Diana Metes

University of Pittsburgh

W

Wayne Stallaert

N

Nidhi Sahni

J

Jishnu Das

H

Harinder Singh

University of Pittsburgh