Characterising humoral and airway immunity following Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection challenge in older adults 2309278

P Pete Dayananda (University of Cambridge) S Stephanie Ascough N Nana-Marie Lemm J Joanne McKenzie (Imperial College London) P Patrick Marsall (University of Tübingen) H Helen Wagstaffe (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) L Loukas Papargyris H Henna Siddiqui (Imperial College London) J Jon Guy (Imperial College London) J Jiayun Xu (College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education) L Lydia Slater (Imperial College London) O Orlagh Daly (Imperial College London) L Lucy Danso (Imperial College London) P Polly Fox (Imperial College London) A Alex Dulovic C Christopher Chiu

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory viral illness in older adults, yet the effect of ageing on systemic and mucosal immunity against RSV infection remain unclear. Using a RSV controlled human infection model (CHIM) in young and older adults, we examined early humoral and mucosal immunity, identified age-related immune differences, and explored immune correlates of protection at both systemic and airway sites. Methods Twenty-eight older (60—75 years) and 8 young (18—55 years) adults were inoculated intranasally with RSV A Memphis-37. Viral loads were measured by qPCR. Symptoms and paired serum, nasal, and bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) were collected longitudinally. Neutralising antibodies and F and G protein—specific responses were quantified. Samples from a previous young adult CHIM using the same virus were also included. Results Older adults showed higher infection rates (68% vs 31%) and greater viral shedding. Pre-existing serum neutralising titres correlated with protection in older, but not young adults. Serum IgG responses were comparable across age groups and targeted pre-F epitopes. Nasal IgA responses while intact overall, showed limited boosting of pre-F-specific antibodies, that have the most potent neutralising activity. Multiplex analysis confirmed these patterns and demonstrated increased G-specific nasal IgA in older infected adults, which was correlated with protection. A similar pattern was also seen in BAL samples, but these did not correlate with protection from infection. Conclusion RSV CHIM in older adults is safe and reveals preserved systemic neutralising and IgG responses. Healthy older adults, however, were more susceptible to infection and exhibited distinct mucosal antibody profiles, with G-specific nasal IgA emerging as a potentially strong correlate of protection. These findings have implications for vaccine design in older adults, particularly as current approved vaccines only target RSV pre-F protein. Funding Source National Institute of Health Research; United Kingdom Research and Innovation Topic Categories Viral Immunology (VIR)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 215, Issue Supplement_1
Published August 01, 2026
ISSN 0022-1767
Publisher American Association of Immunologists

Authors (16)

P

Pete Dayananda

University of Cambridge

S

Stephanie Ascough

N

Nana-Marie Lemm

J

Joanne McKenzie

Imperial College London

P

Patrick Marsall

University of Tübingen

H

Helen Wagstaffe

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

L

Loukas Papargyris

H

Henna Siddiqui

Imperial College London

J

Jon Guy

Imperial College London

J

Jiayun Xu

College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education

L

Lydia Slater

Imperial College London

O

Orlagh Daly

Imperial College London

L

Lucy Danso

Imperial College London

P

Polly Fox

Imperial College London

A

Alex Dulovic

C

Christopher Chiu