Chemotherapy or targeted therapy?: Real-world comparative outcomes in advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer in resource-limited settings.
Abstract
e18013 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) poses a significant global health burden, with 1.43 million new cases and 0.51 million deaths reported in 2020, over 90% of which are squamous cell carcinomas. Early-stage disease is typically managed with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or combinations thereof. For unresectable or advanced HNC, treatment options are expanding to include immunotherapy-based regimens; however, access to these therapies is often limited in resource-constrained settings due to financial burden. In this context, affordable and effective alternatives remain essential. Our study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil versus the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib in advanced HNC in a resource-limited setting. Methods: After institutional review board approval, 180 patients (>18 years) with advanced HNC were enrolled between May and December 2022. Patients with stage I/II disease, pregnancy, lactation, medical unfitness for chemotherapy, or allergies to study drugs were excluded. Participants were randomized to receive either CF (n=96) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles or gefitinib 250 mg BID daily for 3 months. Tumor response was assessed by CT scans at baseline and every 8 weeks. Toxicities were recorded each cycle. Comparisons were made using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests; p<0.05 was significant. Results: A total of 180 patients were included, with 53.3% receiving CF and 46.7% receiving Gefitinib. Overall response rates were similar between groups, with 50% achieving complete or partial responses. Complete responses occurred in 7.3% of CF patients versus 4.8% with Gefitinib, and partial responses in 42.7% versus 48.8%, respectively. Progressive disease was seen in 51.5% of CF patients versus 48.5% with Gefitinib, while stable disease was reported in 64.6% versus 42.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in overall response. Treatment discontinuation was higher in the CF group (34.4% vs. 22.6%), and adverse events including vomiting, renal insufficiency, fever, bone marrow suppression, hearing loss, and skin rashes were more frequent with CF. Conclusions: Our study showed that both palliative care approaches effectively halted disease progression in the majority of patients with advanced HNC. Adverse effects from chemotherapy remain a significant concern, affecting both treatment adherence and quality of life. Gefitinib monotherapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile with fewer adverse events and represents a practical therapeutic option due to its oral administration. Further multi-center, long-term studies are needed to fully establish its efficacy in patients who have difficult access to immunotherapy.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Berkha Rani
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Ahmad Abed
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Sonia Babu
Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA
Sai Abhishek Narra
2Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, United States
Jaison Lawrence Alexander Santhi
Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, Pennsylvania, United States
Hassan Ali
Elizaveta Bodrova
4Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Romana Awan
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Aftab Ahmad
Sivaguhayadunath Prabhakaran
Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA
Alexandra Boc
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Tuba Khan
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Darby, United States
Mano Thirumaran
Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA
Sunina Kingrani
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan