Chidamide plus envafolimab combined with S-1 as second-line treatment in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (P-henomS/SCOG-P002): A single-arm, exploratory, multicenter, phase 2 trial—Interim report.
Abstract
740 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers with poor prognosis worldwide. Chidamide, a subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has significant anti-tumor effects and extensive synergistic effects with immunotherapy. Envafolimab is a light-chain deficient PD-L1 antibody. Here we conducted a single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase Ⅱ clinical study (ChiCTR2200058431) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chidamide plus Envafolimab combined with S-1 as second-line treatment in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic PDAC receive Envafolimab (400 mg, on day 1), Chidamide (20 mg orally twice weekly, on days 0, 3, 7, and 10), and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area, orally twice daily from day 1 to 14) every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary end points are safety and ORR. The secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, DCR, QoL and nutrition score. Results: Recruitment completed with 16 patients as of September 2023 and the data cut-off for analysis was August 2024, 13 were evaluable. Median age was 66 (range 59 - 80), with 5 males and 11 females. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, the ORR and DCR by RECIST v1.1 were 30.77% and 76.92%, respectively. Median PFS was 5.83 months (95%CI 2.592-9.068) and median OS was not reached. No new safety signals were observed. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 31.25% of patients. The most common TRAEs were anemia (12.5%), decreased platelet count (6.25%) and neutropenia (12.5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that Chidamide and Envafolimab in combination with S-1 may be an effective second-line treatment with a manageable safety profile for patients with PDAC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200058431 . Efficacy evaluation. Efficacy Evaluation AII (N = 13) n(%) Best efficacy evaluation Partial Response (PR) 4(30.77%) Stable Disease (SD) 6(46.15%) Progressive Disease (PD) 3(23.08%) Objective response rate (ORR) 30.77% 95%CI 9.09-61.43 Disease control rate (DCR) 76.92% 95%CI 46.19-94.96 mPFS(95%CI) 5.83(2.592-9.068) mOS(95%CI) -(NR)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Wei Li
Kai Chen
Juan Du
College of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Engineering
Xiaofeng Chen
School of Chemical Engineering
Deqiang Wang
Kang He
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University
Caihua Xu
Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Mengyao Wu
Mengdan Xu
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Bingyi Wang
OrigiMed, Shanghai, China