Circulating tumor DNA for detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients (pts) with stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC): Final analysis of the BESPOKE CRC sub-cohort.

P Purvi K. Shah (Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA) V Vasily N. Aushev J Joe Ensor (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) S Stephanie A Sanchez (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) C Christopher Gene Wang (Alabama Oncology, Birmingham, AL) T Timothy Lewis Cannon (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) L Lyudmyla Derby Berim (Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ) T Trevor Feinstein A Axel Grothey J Joseph William McCollom (Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN) S Sujith R. Kalmadi (Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers, Chandler, AZ) A Ahmed Zakari (AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL) F Farshid Dayyani (Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA) D Don Gravenor (Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN) M Minetta C. Liu A Adham A Jurdi (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) A Alexey Aleshin (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) J Janelle Marie Meyer (Oregon Oncology Specialists, Salem, OR) S Saima Sharif (University of Iowa, Coralville, IA) S Scott Kopetz (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston)

Abstract

15 Background: BESPOKE CRC, a multicenter, prospective, observational study investigated the clinical utility of ctDNA for detecting MRD-based early recurrence in pts with surgically resected CRC. The primary endpoint was to assess the impact of ctDNA testing on treatment decisions and asymptomatic recurrence rates. The secondary endpoint was to assess the MRD clearance rate, survival of MRD-negative pts, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Complete clinical and laboratory data were available for 1001 pts with stages II–III CRC. Longitudinal ctDNA testing was performed prospectively using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc.). Plasma time points (n=8,536) were collected during the MRD (2-12 weeks postoperatively) and surveillance (post-adjuvant chemotherapy [ACT] completion/12 weeks postoperatively for pts observed) windows. We evaluated the correlation between ctDNA status and disease-free survival (DFS) as part of exploratory analysis. Results: Following curative resection, 62.4% (625/1001) pts received ACT: 25.9% (115/443) stage II, and 91.3% (510/558) stage III.Among pts with ctDNA results available during the MRD window with a median follow-up of 23.15 (range: 2.89-33.45) months, ctDNA-positivity was observed in 8.1% (34/420) of stage II and 24.9% (126/505) of stage III pts. A significant association between ctDNA positivity and inferior DFS was observed in stage II (HR=10.4; p<0.0001), and stage III (HR=10.1, p<0.0001) pts. 18/24 month DFS estimates for stages II-III combined were: (MRD-negative: 93.0%/91.7%; MRD-positive: 44.4%/41.4%). Analysis of surveillance was performed separately for pts observed (N=368) vs. ACT-treated (N=597). During surveillance, in the observation cohort, 6.8% (22/323) of stage II, and 33.3% of stage III (15/45) pts tested ctDNA-positive correlating with significantly worse DFS (stage II: HR=34.9; p<0.0001, stage III: HR=34.1; p=0.0008). Likewise, in the ACT cohort, 10.9% (12/110) of stage II and 21.1% of stage III (103/487) pts turned ctDNA-positive and had significantly worse DFS (stage II: HR=131.4; p<0.0001, stage III: HR=54.6; p<0.0001). Analysis of primary and secondary endpoints will be presented. Conclusions: ctDNA positivity was highly prognostic of DFS within MRD and surveillance windows in a subset of stages II-III pts enrolled in the BESPOKE CRC study. Our results highlight the potential value of ctDNA-based MRD detection for treatment-decision making, and findings relevant to clinical utility will be reported in the conference presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT04264702 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 15-15
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

P

Purvi K. Shah

Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA

V

Vasily N. Aushev

J

Joe Ensor

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

S

Stephanie A Sanchez

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

C

Christopher Gene Wang

Alabama Oncology, Birmingham, AL

T

Timothy Lewis Cannon

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

L

Lyudmyla Derby Berim

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

T

Trevor Feinstein

A

Axel Grothey

J

Joseph William McCollom

Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN

S

Sujith R. Kalmadi

Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers, Chandler, AZ

A

Ahmed Zakari

AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL

F

Farshid Dayyani

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA

D

Don Gravenor

Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN

M

Minetta C. Liu

A

Adham A Jurdi

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

A

Alexey Aleshin

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

J

Janelle Marie Meyer

Oregon Oncology Specialists, Salem, OR

S

Saima Sharif

University of Iowa, Coralville, IA

S

Scott Kopetz

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston