Clinical validity of FoundationOne CDx assay to identify <i>HRR</i> -positive or <i>BRCA</i> -positive mCSPC patients in the phase 3 AMPLITUDE study.

U Usha Singh V Victoria Zadorozhny (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ) L Lesley Farrington (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Los Angeles, CA) K Katie Bell (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA) G Gary V. Borzillo (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA) F Fei Shen S Sharon McCarthy (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ) C Carly R. Varela (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ) D Daneen Schaeffer (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA) S Suneel Dinkar Mundle (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ) Y Yueyi (Kate) Li (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA) T Ta-Chou (Vincent) Ng (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA) S Songbai Wang (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ)

Abstract

166 Background: AMPLITUDE, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the safety and efficacy of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate with prednisone (NIRA+AAP) in patients (pts) with homologous recombination repair-positive ( HRR +) mCSPC. Nira+AAP is indicated for BRCA + metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) pts, as identified by an approved companion diagnostic tissue (FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx). We evaluated the clinical utility of the tissue F1CDx test to identify HRR + or BRCA+ mCSPC pts in the AMPLITUDE study. Methods: HRR status was prospectively evaluated in AMPLITUDE pts utilizing central (tissue- F1CDx) and/or local tests as clinical trial assays (CTAs), and the efficacy of Nira+AAP was evaluated by the primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Clinical utility of F1CDx was explored by comparing rPFS between treatment arms in HRR + and BRCA + pts identified by F1CDx and overall enrolled by CTAs in AMPLITUDE. Results: Out of 696 enrolled HRR+ pts, 549 (78.9%) were evaluated by F1CDx assay. Out of 549 pts, 468 (85.2%) were HRR + (including 273 [49.7%] BRCA + pts), 81 (14.7%) were neg. The Hazard Ratio (HR) of rPFS in HRR + pts identified by F1CDx was 0.56 (95% 2-sided Confidence Interval (CI): 0.42,0.76) vs overall HRR+ pts in the study 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.79). In BRCA + pts identified by F1CDx, the HR was 0.46 (95% 2-sided CI: 0.30, 0.69) vs overall BRCA + 0.515 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.717). Conclusions: Clinical efficacy of NIRA+AAP was consistent in F1CDx-identified HRR + or BRCA + pts compared with the overall patient population in AMPLITUDE, demonstrating the clinical utility of the F1CDx assay to identify HRR + or BRCA + mCSPC patients to help guide treatment decision regarding NIRA+AAP. Clinical trial information: NCT04497844 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 166-166
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

U

Usha Singh

V

Victoria Zadorozhny

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ

L

Lesley Farrington

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Los Angeles, CA

K

Katie Bell

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA

G

Gary V. Borzillo

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA

F

Fei Shen

S

Sharon McCarthy

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ

C

Carly R. Varela

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ

D

Daneen Schaeffer

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Spring House, PA

S

Suneel Dinkar Mundle

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ

Y

Yueyi (Kate) Li

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA

T

Ta-Chou (Vincent) Ng

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA

S

Songbai Wang

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Raritan, NJ