COMMIT: A Randomized Study of mFOLFOX6/Bevacizumab/Atezolizumab or Atezolizumab Alone as First-Line Treatment of Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE Immunotherapy for frontline mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective; however, nearly half of the patients treated with single-agent PD-1 therapy will progress within 12 months. Preclinical studies in CRC and clinical data from other cancers suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition and chemotherapy can synergize with PD-L1 inhibition. METHODS The NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610 (COMMIT) three-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomly assigned first-line dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (1:1:1) to either: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m², and 46-hour infusional 5-FU 2,400 mg/m²)/bevacizumab (FFX/bev), or atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy (840 mg IV once every 2 weeks), or the combination of FFX/bev/atezo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population. Because of KEYNOTE 177 results, the FFX/bev arm was closed after 20 patients were enrolled. The study continued with atezo alone versus FFX/bev/atezo, with a revised sample size of 100 patients in the two remaining arms (120 patients across all three arms). RESULTS From November 2017 to March 2025, a total of 102 patients were enrolled in the three arms: FFX/bev: n = 20, atezo: n = 41, and FFX/bev/atezo: n = 41. At a median follow-up of 46 months for the two arms (median age: 63.3 years; 47.6% female; 23.2% BRAF V600E mutated), PFS of FFX/bev/atezo was superior to that of atezo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.439 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.84]; P = .0103) and below the critical value of 0.0152. The objective response rate was 86.1% versus 46%, and the disease control rate at 12 months was 64.7% versus 32.4% in the FFX/bev/atezo arm compared with the atezo-only arm, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any attribution occurred in 52 patients (atezo: 18; combination arm: 34). CONCLUSION The combination of FFX/bev plus atezo led to significantly longer PFS compared with atezo monotherapy in the first-line treatment of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (22)
Caio Max Sao Pedro Rocha Lima
Atrium Health Wake Forest University Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
Greg Yothers
NRG Oncology SDMC, Pittsburgh, PA
Thomas J. George
Howard S. Hochster
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
Hanna K. Sanoff
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Deirdre J. Cohen
Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
Katherine A. Guthrie
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center; and SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
Samuel A. Jacobs
NSABP Foundation, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA
Anwaar Saeed
Scott Kopetz
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Linda H. Colangelo
NRG Oncology SDMC, Pittsburgh, PA
Tanner J. Freeman
NSABP Foundation, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA
Scott W. Cole
Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, OK
Maged Khalil
Lehigh Valley-Cedar Crest Hospital, Allentown, PA
Swapna Devanna
United Hospital, St Paul, MN
Dan S. Zuckerman
St Luke's Cancer Institute, Boise, ID
Theodore S. Hong
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
N. Lynn Henry
Patricia A. Ganz
Department of Health Policy and Management UCLA Fielding School of Public Health Los Angeles California USA
Charles D. Blanke
Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Knight Cancer Center, Portland, OR
Norman Wolmark
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh
Michael J. Overman