Competing Grain Growth Pathways in Anisotropic Bi <sub>2</sub> Te <sub>3</sub> ‐Based Thermoelectric Nanoplates

Z Zefan Xue (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.) X Xiege Huang W Weixiao Lin (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.) W Wenjun Cui (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.) Z Zhi Yang W Wen Zhao (School of Materials Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China.) C Congli Sun (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering) G Guodong Li (Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience) G Gustaaf Van Tendeloo (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.) X Xiahan Sang (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.)

Abstract

Abstract Thermoelectric nanoplates derived from anisotropic van der Waals (vdW) materials such as Bi 2 Te 3 are pivotal for flexible electronics and microscale thermal management. Their performance critically depends on grain boundary (GB) microstructure, but the atomic‐scale mechanisms governing grain growth in these highly anisotropic systems remain elusive. This particularly concerns the competition between individual nanoplate reshaping driven by facet stabilization and collective merging at GBs. Integrating in situ scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), density functional theory (DFT), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, these competing pathways in pure Bi 2 Te 3 (BT) and Sb‐doped (BST) systems are unraveled. Undoped BT nanoplates preferentially undergo atomically localized reshaping, with atoms migrating from high‐energy edges to stabilize low‐energy facets. Conversely, Sb doping introduces Sb‐Te interfacial phases that thermodynamically favor GB coalescence, thereby shifting the dominant pathway to collective merging. This work reveals how chemical modification steers GB evolution, determining whether reshaping or merging predominates. Such understanding is crucial for rationally designing anisotropic layered materials for applications in flexible electronics, topological materials, and energy‐efficient devices.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 1
Published January 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (10)

Z

Zefan Xue

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

X

Xiege Huang

W

Weixiao Lin

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

W

Wenjun Cui

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

Z

Zhi Yang

W

Wen Zhao

School of Materials Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China.

C

Congli Sun

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering

G

Guodong Li

Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience

G

Gustaaf Van Tendeloo

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

X

Xiahan Sang

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.