Conventional-dose chemotherapy as first salvage in germ cell tumors: Outcomes from an Ibero-American multi-institutional cohort.

I Iván Macharashvili (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) F Felipe Jové (Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) R Rodney Ramirez-Murillo (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) M Mauricio Tournour (Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) S Sebastian Leglise (Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina) P Pablo Alvarez Ballesteros (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain) L Laura Ferrer-Mileo (Department of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) M Maria Natalia Gandur-Quiroga (Department of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumors, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina) F Federico Cayol (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) E Enrique González-Billalabeitia F Florencia Guerra (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina) D Daniel Castellano Gauna (Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

597 Background: In relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors, two salvage strategies are commonly used: conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation. Current evidence remains insufficient to define the optimal approach, and the predictive value of existing risk models has not been prospectively validated. This study describes oncological outcomes according to the International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG) classification in patients receiving CDCT as first salvage therapy in a multi-institutional Ibero-American cohort (Argentina and Spain), where access to HDCT is limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study including patients with germ cell tumors treated between 2009 and 2023. All received CDCT as first-line salvage therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to IPFSG classification. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: We included 91 patients with a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 6.7–51). Among them, 40 (47%) achieved complete or partial response with negative markers. Progression-free survival was significantly poorer in patients with high to very high Beyer classification than in those with very low, low, or intermediate risk (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.07–4.49, p = 0.036). Similarly, overall survival was worse in the high to very high group (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.22–4.90, p = 0.008). Median PFS and OS for patients refractory to first-line treatment were 11 and 17 months, respectively, versus 45 and 70 months for non-refractory patients. Conclusions: While CDCT remains a feasible option for salvage therapy in settings with limited HDCT access, prospective studies are needed to refine risk models and optimize strategies. CDCT appears appropriate for non-refractory and low-risk patients; however, alternative or intensified therapies are required for those with higher risk. Baseline characteristics (n = 91). Primary site Testis 79 (87%) Histology Non seminoma 74 (83%) Non pulmonary visceral metastasis Yes 20 (23%) Refractory to first line 1 Yes 44 (48,3%) IPFSG 2 Very Low 10 (11%) Low 9 (9,9%) Intermediate 31 (34,1%) High 30 (33%) Very High 10 (11%) Chemotherapy regimen TIP 3 72 (79%) 1 Patients were considered refractory to first-line therapy if the PFI was <6 months from the start of treatment. 2 International Prognostic Factors Study Group. 3 Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, Cisplatin.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 597-597
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

I

Iván Macharashvili

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

F

Felipe Jové

Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

R

Rodney Ramirez-Murillo

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

M

Mauricio Tournour

Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

S

Sebastian Leglise

Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina

P

Pablo Alvarez Ballesteros

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

L

Laura Ferrer-Mileo

Department of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

M

Maria Natalia Gandur-Quiroga

Department of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumors, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

F

Federico Cayol

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

E

Enrique González-Billalabeitia

F

Florencia Guerra

Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

D

Daniel Castellano Gauna

Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain