Conversion from radical esophagectomy to definitive chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Treatment options based on chemotherapy response.

K Kiyoshi Narita (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) E Eiji Higaki (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) T Tetsuya Abe (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) H Hironori Fujieda (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) S Shingo Hashimoto (Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) S Shigenori Kadowaki (Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) M Masahiro Tajika T Takeshi Kodaira (Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) K Kei Muro (Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) Y Yasuhiro Shimizu

Abstract

408 Background: Radical esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the established strategy for resectable advanced esophageal cancer. However, some patients convert to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) after NAC due to reasons such as their wishes or disease progression, and their prognosis remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients who converted to dCRT. Methods: Patients who underwent NAC for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled retrospectively. The prognostic impact of subsequent treatment after NAC, planned surgery or conversion to dCRT, was compared. Results: We analyzed 686 patients, 70 who converted to dCRT (dCRT group) and 616 who underwent surgery (Surg group). The dCRT group had a poorer prognosis than the Surg group, with more advanced tumors and poorer response to NAC. Therefore, further analysis was conducted by categorizing patients as Responders (complete or partial response) and Non-responders (stable or progressive disease) to NAC. Among Responders in the dCRT group, 76.7% achieved a complete response, and the 5-year esophageal preservation survival rate was 66.9%. The 5-year survival rates for Responders were 77.5% and 71.3% in the dCRT and Surg groups. Multivariable analysis showed that dCRT did not worsen prognosis ( P = .706, hazard ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 2.16). Conversely, in Non-responders, dCRT had a significantly poorer prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of 22.3% and 45.1% in the dCRT and the Surg groups (P < .001). Conclusions: For patients responding to NAC, conversion to dCRT is considered a potential treatment option. The possibility of chemoselection has been suggested in the choice of treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 408-408
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

K

Kiyoshi Narita

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

E

Eiji Higaki

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

T

Tetsuya Abe

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

H

Hironori Fujieda

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

S

Shingo Hashimoto

Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

S

Shigenori Kadowaki

Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

M

Masahiro Tajika

T

Takeshi Kodaira

Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

K

Kei Muro

Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Y

Yasuhiro Shimizu