Correlates of immunotherapy response in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma from circulating cell-free epigenomes.

R Razane El Hajj Chehade (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) K Karl Semaan (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) Z Ze Zhang (Department of Polymer Science and Engineering) N Noa Phillips (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) L Lexi Grisham (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) R Rebecca Prather (Gadsden Regional Medical Center, Gadsden, AL) K Katy Beckermann (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) U Ulka N. Vaishampayan (Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) N Naomi Balzer Haas (Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) H Hans J. Hammers (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) D David F. McDermott (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA) L Lauren Michelle Wood (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) T Travis Solley (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) B Brian I. Rini E Eric Jonasch (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) T Toni K. Choueiri (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) M Matthew Freedman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) S Scott Mattox Haake (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) S Sylvan C. Baca (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) J Jacob E Berchuck (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA)

Abstract

593 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a mainstay of treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). With a growing number of treatment options for mccRCC, biomarkers are needed to guide treatment selection by predicting benefit from ICIs. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based assays that measure tumor DNA in plasma are promising biomarkers for treatment response in several cancers, but their role in RCC remains unclear. Here, we tested whether epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA can identify or predict radiographic responses to immunotherapy in mccRCC. Methods: Plasma samples were obtained from 180 patients (400 total samples collected, up to 4 samples per patient) with mccRCC enrolled in the DOD-funded Kidney Cancer Research Consortium ctDNA study (NCT04883827). Patients received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and were categorized as non-responders or responders based on CT scan results obtained at 3- or 6-months following treatment initiation. Cell-free chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfChIP-seq) was performed on patient plasma to profile H3K4me3, a histone modification associated with active gene promoters. DNA methylation was profiled with cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq). H3K4me3 signal at the promoters of ccRCC-associated genes variation between pre-treatment and on-treatment timepoints was assessed for non-responders and responders. We calculated changes in H3K4me3 signal for on- and pre-treatment plasma draws. We then compared these changes between non-responders and responders using the Wilcoxon sum-rank test. The immune cell types contributing to cfDNA were inferred from cfMeDIP-seq data. Results: Comparing pre- and on-treatment timepoints drawn between 1-5 months after starting therapy, cfDNA promoter H3K4me3 at RCC-associated genes was concordant with radiographic response in 10 of 11 patients (91%), with signal increasing from pre- to on-treatment samples in 6 of 7 non-responders (86%) and decreasing in 4 of 4 responders (100%). The median change in H3K4me3 differed significantly for non-responders and responders (p = 0.02). Analysis of cfDNA methylation profiles identified a higher proportion of memory CD8 T cell-derived cfDNA in non-responders compared to responders in pre-treatment samples (p = 0.003) Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that epigenomic profiling of cfDNA may identify pre-treatment and on-treatment biomarkers of ICI response. Profiling of larger cohorts is underway to test the generalizability of these findings.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 593-593
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

R

Razane El Hajj Chehade

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

K

Karl Semaan

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Z

Ze Zhang

Department of Polymer Science and Engineering

N

Noa Phillips

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

L

Lexi Grisham

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

R

Rebecca Prather

Gadsden Regional Medical Center, Gadsden, AL

K

Katy Beckermann

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

U

Ulka N. Vaishampayan

Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

N

Naomi Balzer Haas

Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

H

Hans J. Hammers

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

D

David F. McDermott

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

L

Lauren Michelle Wood

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

T

Travis Solley

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

B

Brian I. Rini

E

Eric Jonasch

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

T

Toni K. Choueiri

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

M

Matthew Freedman

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

S

Scott Mattox Haake

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

S

Sylvan C. Baca

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

J

Jacob E Berchuck

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA