Darolutamide Alone and in Combination With Goserelin in Androgen Receptor–Positive Salivary Gland Carcinoma: Results From the Phase II DISCOVARY Trial
Abstract
PURPOSE Salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), particularly salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), is a rare and aggressive malignancy with no standard systemic treatment. Androgen receptor (AR) expression is frequently detected in SDC, which suggests inhibition of the AR pathway as a therapeutic strategy. We conducted a prospective phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of darolutamide, a second-generation AR signaling inhibitor, as monotherapy or in combination with goserelin, in patients with AR-positive unresectable locally advanced (LA) or recurrent/metastatic (R/M) SGC. METHODS DISCOVARY was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial conducted in Japan. Patients with unresectable LA or R/M AR-positive SGC were enrolled into two sequential cohorts, a monotherapy cohort (darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily) and a combination cohort (darolutamide plus goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 28 days). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients were enrolled (monotherapy, n = 24; combination, n = 33). In the monotherapy cohort, the confirmed ORR was 8.3% (90% CI, 1.5 to 24.0) and the median PFS was 5.7 months. In the combination cohort, ORR was 45.2% (90% CI, 29.7 to 61.3) and the median PFS was 13.1 months. Twelve-month OS rates were 91.3% and 87.0%, respectively. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity, with no treatment-related deaths. Quality of life was preserved. No clear association between AR expression level or Ki-67 index and treatment response was evident in exploratory analysis. CONCLUSION Darolutamide demonstrated antitumor activity in AR-positive SGC, with numerically more favorable outcomes with goserelin. Darolutamide plus goserelin may represent a chemotherapy-sparing option in this rare malignancy.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Susumu Okano
Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
Makoto Tahara
Kiyoaki Tsukahara
Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
Tomoyuki Otsuka
Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
Satoshi Kano
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
Masato Nagaoka
Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Hideoki Uryu
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
Daisuke Sano
Naoki Nishio
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
Kazuchika Ono
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Akira Ohkoshi
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
Toyoyuki Hanazawa
Satoru Shinoda
Yuriko Takeda
YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials (Y-NEXT), Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
Kouji Yamamoto
YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials (Y-NEXT), Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
Naomi Kiyota
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Center, Kobe University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan