Disparities in inpatient treatment delivery for gynecologic cancers: A national analysis using machine learning.

M Maria Alejandra Molina Rodriguez (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) F Furkan Haney (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) S Sameer Ali (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) M Meenal Gehlawat (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) S Sarpuneet Singh Jhajj (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) T Tahira Fardous (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) R Rabé Alhurani (Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA) N Neel Sagar Talwar (City of Hope National Medical Center, Upland, CA)

Abstract

e13694 Background: Patients with gynecologic malignancies are frequently hospitalized for cancer-related and unrelated indications. Treatment varies by cancer type: endometrial and ovarian cancers are managed with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy; early cervical cancer requires surgery while locally advanced disease requires chemoradiation; vulvar and vaginal cancers require surgical resection with or without radiation. We used machine learning to identify factors associated with treatment receipt among hospitalized patients. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021) for hospitalizations with cervical, ovarian, endometrial, vulvar, or vaginal cancer. Treatment was defined as gynecologic surgery, staging/debulking, lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy during admission. A gradient boosting classifier predicted treatment receipt with SHAP analysis for feature importance. Results: Among 188,709 admissions (mean age 62; 66% White, 15% Black, 11% Hispanic), 34% included treatment. Among treated patients, 67% received gynecologic surgery, 47% oophorectomy/salpingectomy, 17% lymphadenectomy, 9% omentectomy, 4% chemotherapy, and 1% radiotherapy. Treatment rates by cancer: endometrial 38%, ovarian 33%, cervical 26%, vulvar 17%. Elective admissions were more likely to include treatment than non-elective (77% vs 13%). Treatment was more frequent at urban teaching vs rural hospitals (37% vs 16%) and among privately insured vs Medicare patients (44% vs 28%). Model AUC: 0.906. Top predictors: admission type, teaching status, age, cancer type, payer. Conclusions: Treatment delivery varies substantially by admission context and hospital setting. These system-level factors may represent targets for improving care coordination and access.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

M

Maria Alejandra Molina Rodriguez

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

F

Furkan Haney

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

S

Sameer Ali

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

M

Meenal Gehlawat

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

S

Sarpuneet Singh Jhajj

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

T

Tahira Fardous

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

R

Rabé Alhurani

Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA

N

Neel Sagar Talwar

City of Hope National Medical Center, Upland, CA