Earlier CRS identification with continuous wearable monitoring in outpatient CAR T-cell therapy.

J Jonas Paludo (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) M Michael Pettinati (Ametris, Pensacola, FL) J Joshua C. Pritchett (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Christine Guo (Ametris, Pensacola, FL) M Michael W. Ruff (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) L Lucy M. Holmes (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) K Kelsey L. Haugen (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) M Michelle Amundson (1Mayo Clinic, Hematology, Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States) A Arushi Khurana (2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) N Nabila Nora Bennani (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) Y Yucai Wang (State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine) T Taxiarchis Kourelis (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) S Shaji Kumar P Prashant Kapoor (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) M Moritz Binder (Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic) N Nadine Abdallah (2Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, United States) S Stephen M. Ansell (3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo School of Graduate Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) T Tufia C. Haddad (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) Y Yi Lin D David M. Routman (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN)

Abstract

1633 Background: CAR-T cell therapy has transformed outcomes of hematologic malignancies and is poised to expand into solid malignancies. However, broader use of CAR-T remains constrained by the need for timely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) detection. Current episodic monitoring may miss early physiologic changes. Wearable digital health technologies (DHTs), offering continuous monitoring and real-time alerts, could enable earlier CRS detection, further support outpatient delivery, and expand access to CAR-T and potentially other immunotherapies associated with CRS. Methods: This single-center observational study (NCT05018208) enrolled patients receiving FDA-approved CAR-T products in the outpatient setting at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN. Management of post-CAR-T complications (e.g. CRS) followed the institution’s standard of care. Patients were monitored from day -5 to day +30 post infusion with intermittent remote patient monitoring (SoC) and an arm-worn wearable device for continuous monitoring (DHT). Patients were included in this analysis if DHT data were available for ≥ 5h of data/day or ≥ 2h of data/night on ≥2 days or nights for baseline and ≥1 day or night within 72h prior to CRS, or at least 2h within 4h of CRS onset, or if DHT was available for ≥7 days/nights post infusion with no CRS event. CRS detection time by DHT was defined as the onset of pyrexia or threshold-based deviation from an individual’s baseline pulse distributions. Results: 32 patients were included in this report (median age 64 years, gender 12 F/20 M, diagnoses 18 MM/14 NHL). 25 patients experienced a CRS event, with maximum CRS grades ranging from 1-3 (16 G1, 8 G2, 1 G3). 24/25 patients with CRS required tocilizumab/steroid. Median CRS onset time was 3.4 days (range 0.4-18.4). 12/32 patients had sufficient DHT data (7 CRS, 5 no CRS) for analysis. 5 patients with CRS had a DHT detection time in advance of the SoC by a median of 13h (range 2.8 - 69.2). The DHT prediction of CRS by baseline HR change was earlier than the first episodic fever by a median of 14.5h (range 13-77.5). The remaining 2/7 patients who did not have CRS detected by the DHT had missing DHT data for more than 45h before a treated CRS event. DHT detected CRS in 2/5 patients without CRS according to SoC. One patient had fever caught with intermittent monitoring. The other was treated for neutropenia fever with suspicion of CRS and/or infection. Conclusions: These results offer evidence that continuous DHT can identify CRS events earlier than intermittent monitoring (SoC). Despite limitations related to compliance with wearable device use and data missingness, and variability in clinical management of CRS, we highlight the usability of DHT and its potential for future studies with optimized strategies to address these limitations. Clinical trial information: NCT05018208 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1633-1633
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Jonas Paludo

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

M

Michael Pettinati

Ametris, Pensacola, FL

J

Joshua C. Pritchett

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Christine Guo

Ametris, Pensacola, FL

M

Michael W. Ruff

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

L

Lucy M. Holmes

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

K

Kelsey L. Haugen

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

M

Michelle Amundson

1Mayo Clinic, Hematology, Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States

A

Arushi Khurana

2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

N

Nabila Nora Bennani

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Y

Yucai Wang

State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine

T

Taxiarchis Kourelis

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

S

Shaji Kumar

P

Prashant Kapoor

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

M

Moritz Binder

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic

N

Nadine Abdallah

2Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, United States

S

Stephen M. Ansell

3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo School of Graduate Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

T

Tufia C. Haddad

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Y

Yi Lin

D

David M. Routman

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN