Efficacy and safety of depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414) in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

S Sunjida Amin Promi (Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh) I Ibrahim Khalil (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) U Umme Kulsum M M. Rafiqul Islam (Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) I Irfat Islam Eva (Comilla Medical College and Hospital, Comilla, Bangladesh) M Md Abu Sayed (Chattogram medical college, Chattogam, Bangladesh) A Anika Chowdhury (Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Shaila Saaki (Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M Manisha Das (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Shara Haque (Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M Md. Ahsanul Hoque (Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmad Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) Z Zahin Zeima (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri (College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq) A Arindam Das Joy (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M Md. Imran Hossain

Abstract

2060 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a poor prognosis, typically resulting in a median survival of 12–15 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations, present in half of GBM cases, are key therapeutic targets. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M, ABT-414), an EGFR-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, represents a novel therapeutic option. This Bayesian network meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of Depatux-M in EGFR-amplified GBM. Methods: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,183 patients were analyzed. Trials evaluating Depatux-M as monotherapy or combined with temozolomide (TMZ) and/or radiotherapy (RT) were included. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety (grade 3/4 adverse events and keratitis). Bayesian models estimated mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI), while SUCRA values ranked treatments. Results: Depatux-M plus TMZ showed modest OS improvement over TMZ alone (MD: 0.91 months; 95% CrI: -11.83 to 13.86; SUCRA: 62.09%). Depatux-M monotherapy showed minimal OS benefit (MD: 0.07 months; 95% CrI: -12.69 to 12.95; SUCRA: 51.2%), and the combination of Depatux-M, TMZ, and RT had the lowest OS benefit (MD: -2.17 months; 95% CrI: -19.83 to 15.74; SUCRA: 35.48%). For PFS, Depatux-M monotherapy performed best (MD: 1.46 months; 95% CrI: -4.92 to 7.78; SUCRA: 81.00%), while Depatux-M plus TMZ (MD: -0.45 months; 95% CrI: -6.85 to 5.89; SUCRA: 40.03%) and Depatux-M, TMZ, and RT (MD: -1.54 months; 95% CrI: -10.34 to 7.24; SUCRA: 28.32%) were less effective. Depatux-M monotherapy had a lower RR for grade 3/4 adverse events (RR: 1.38; 95% CrI: 0.23 to 8.07) and keratitis (RR: 2.62; 95% CrI: 0.43 to 15.63) compared to combination regimens, with the highest keratitis risks observed in Depatux-M, TMZ, and RT. Conclusions: Depatuxizumab mafodotin offers limited survival benefits in EGFR-amplified GBM, with monotherapy showing the most favorable PFS. However, significant safety concerns, particularly keratitis, warrant further research to optimize its therapeutic potential and identify more tolerable regimens. Efficacy and safety outcomes of depatuxizumab mafodotin in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma. Regimen Overall Survival (OS) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Grade 3/4 Adverse Events (RR) Keratitis (RR) Depatux-M + TMZ 0.91 (-11.83 to 13.86); SUCRA 62.09 -0.45 (-6.85 to 5.89); SUCRA 40.03 1.54 (0.20 to 13.53); SUCRA 41.75 4.40 (0.51 to 31.10); SUCRA 33.07 Depatux-M 0.07 (-12.69 to 12.95); SUCRA 51.20 1.46 (-4.92 to 7.78); SUCRA 81.00 1.38 (0.23 to 8.07); SUCRA 49.06 2.62 (0.43 to 15.63); SUCRA 62.34 Depatux-M + TMZ + RT -2.17 (-19.83 to 15.74); SUCRA 35.48 -1.54 (-10.34 to 7.24); SUCRA 28.32 0.98 (0.09 to 9.65); SUCRA 68.37 6.63 (0.62 to 66.40); SUCRA 12.73

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 2060-2060
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

S

Sunjida Amin Promi

Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh

I

Ibrahim Khalil

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

U

Umme Kulsum

M

M. Rafiqul Islam

Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

I

Irfat Islam Eva

Comilla Medical College and Hospital, Comilla, Bangladesh

M

Md Abu Sayed

Chattogram medical college, Chattogam, Bangladesh

A

Anika Chowdhury

Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Shaila Saaki

Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

Manisha Das

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Shara Haque

Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

Md. Ahsanul Hoque

Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmad Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Z

Zahin Zeima

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri

College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

A

Arindam Das Joy

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

Md. Imran Hossain