Efficacy and safety of ifosfamide and mesna in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy failure.

C Chang Gon Kim (Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) Y Yeo Gyeong Ko (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) J Jongjin Yoon (Department of Radiology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) C Chung Lee (Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) S Seung-Hoon Beom Y Young Deuk Choi (Department of Urology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) W Woong Kyu Han (Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) W Won Sik Ham (Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) H Hyunho Han (Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) J Jongsoo Lee J Ji Eun Heo D Daeseong Kim (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) E Eunsil Baek (Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) S Sang Woo Kim M Minsun Jung S Sang Joon Shin (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea)

Abstract

174 Background: Limited treatment options exist for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with mCRPC after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy (NCT06236789). Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer who had failed taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy received ifosfamide 2,500 mg/m2 and mesna 1,500 mg/m2 on days 1–3, repeated every 21 days. Safety, objective response rate, disease control rate, reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration by >50% (PSA50) or >90% (PSA90), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 47 patients with mCRPC were included in the study. The median number of lines of treatment was 5 (range: 3–7). All patients were previously administered docetaxel and novel hormonal therapies including abiraterone (51.1%) and/or enzalutamide (61.7%). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) were administered cabazitaxel. The objective response and disease control rates were 21.3% and 80.9%, respectively. PSA50 and PSA90 were achieved in 31.9% and 10.6%, respectively. During a median follow-up duration of 54.3 months, rPFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. All the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events of any grades; however, no new safety signs were detected. Genomic biomarker analysis revealed that alterations in the TP53 pathway were associated with inferior rPFS and OS. Conclusions: Ifosfamide and mesna showed appreciable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in heavily treated patients with mCRPC, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT06236789 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 174-174
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

C

Chang Gon Kim

Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Y

Yeo Gyeong Ko

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

J

Jongjin Yoon

Department of Radiology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

C

Chung Lee

Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

S

Seung-Hoon Beom

Y

Young Deuk Choi

Department of Urology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

W

Woong Kyu Han

Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

W

Won Sik Ham

Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

H

Hyunho Han

Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

J

Jongsoo Lee

J

Ji Eun Heo

D

Daeseong Kim

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

E

Eunsil Baek

Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

S

Sang Woo Kim

M

Minsun Jung

S

Sang Joon Shin

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea