Efficacy and safety of regorafenib combination with PD-1 inhibitors vs. regorafenib monotherapy in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of different first-line treatments: A multicenter retrospective real-world study.
Abstract
4088 Background: Regorafenib is the first oral targeted drug as a second-line agent in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on sorafenib treatment.There is a lack of data to validate the second-line therapy after progression of targeted-immune combination therapy. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib alone or in combination with a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in second-line treatment for patients who have failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in combination with PD-1 or TKI monotherapy, respectively. Methods: A total of 288 patients were enrolled in this multicenter, retrospective study. These patients received regorafenib with or without PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab/Camrelizumab/Pembrolizumab) as second-line therapy after failure of TKI (sorafenib/lenvatinib) or such TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab/Camrelizumab/Pembrolizumab). The primary study endpoint was the evaluation of overall survival (OS), while secondary study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment safety. Results: In the first line treatment, 126 patients received TKI and 162 patients received TKI plus PD-1. In the TKI cohort, the Reg-PD-1 group exhibited markedly higher ORR (29.69% vs 4.84%; p<0.001) and DCR (89.06% vs 67.74%; p=0.004), as well as longer median PFS (10.5 vs 4.7 months; p<0.001) and median OS (18.9 vs 14.0 months; p=0.03) compared to the Reg monotherapy group.There was no significant difference in PFS, OS, ORR, and DCR between the two groups in the TKI plus PD-1 cohort.The incidence of AEs was higher in the Reg-PD-1 group compared to the Reg group (81.25 % vs 58.06%; p=0.005) in the TKI cohort. And Reg-PD-1 group was comparable to Reg group (76.70% vs 66.10%; p=0.144) in the TKI Plus PD-1 cohort. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus PD-1 may enhance efficacy in uHCC patients who failed first-line TKI therapy. However, in patients who have progressed after first-line TKI plus PD-1 therapy, using regorafenib alone or in combination with PD-1 in second-line therapy does not show a significant difference in efficacy.These findings have significant implications for the selection of second-line treatment strategies for HCC patients, indicating that the combination of regorafenib and PD-1 might not provide additional benefits in certain patient subgroups. Outcomes in the two cohorts. Outcomes TKI TKI plus PD-1 Reg(n=62) Reg-PD-1 (n=64) P value Reg (n=59) Reg-PD-1 (n=103) P value CR 2 3 - 3 2 - PR 1 16 - 6 21 - SD 39 38 - 35 62 - PD 20 7 - 15 18 - ORR 4.84% 29.69% <0.001 15.25% 22.33% 0.276 DCR 67.74% 89.06% 0.004 74.58% 82.52% 0.227 PFS(m) 4.7 10.5 <0.001 6.3 9.2 0.062 OS(m) 14.0 18.9 0.03 13.2 16.2 0.13
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Weihong Ma
Jiamin Cheng
Research Center for Negative Emissions Technologies (K‐NETs) Kyushu University Motooka 744, Nishi‐ku Fukuoka 819–0395 Japan
Hongli Yu
Caiyun Peng
Comprehensive Liver Cancer Center, The 5th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Jie Han
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Green & Functional Materials and Environmental Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Materials
Jiaqi Liu
Zhipeng Liang
Qinghao Kong
Wenjing Wang
State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter
Jinghui Dong
14Kite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, United States
Aiying Jia
Comprehensive Liver Cancer Center, The 5th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Yinying Lu