Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat for Anemia in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Nonmyeloid Malignancies: A Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Phase III Study

S Shun Lu J Jiong Wu J Jin Jiang Q Qisen Guo (Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China) Y Yan Yu (Department of Respiratory Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin China) Y Yu Liu H Hua Zhang L Ling Qian X Xiumei Dai (Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China) Y Yanyan Xie (Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China) T Ting Fu T Tyson Lee (FibroGen, Inc, San Francisco, CA) Y Yan Lu R Rui Ma (College of Materials, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, iChEM, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, College of Energy, School of Life Sciences, College of Physical Science and Technology, and Discipline of Intelligent Instrument and Equipment) M Mark D. Eisner (FibroGen, Inc, San Francisco, CA)

Abstract

PURPOSE We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat, a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving multicycle treatments of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, noninferiority phase III study conducted at 44 sites in China, 159 participants age ≥18 years with CIA nonmyeloid malignancy and CIA were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral roxadustat or subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin-α (rHuEPO-α) three times a week for 12 weeks. Roxadustat starting dosages were 100, 120, and 150 mg three times a week for participants weighing 40-<50, 50-60, and >60 kg, respectively. rHuEPO-α starting dosage for all participants was 150 IU/kg three times a week. Both roxadustat and rHuEPO-α dosages could be modified. The primary end point was least-squares mean (LSM) change in hemoglobin (Hb) concentration from baseline to the concentration averaged over weeks 9-13. RESULTS Of the 159 participants randomly assigned, 140 were included in the per-protocol set (roxadustat, n = 78; rHuEPO-α, n = 62). The LSM (95% two-sided CI) change from baseline to weeks 9-13 in Hb concentration was 17.1 (13.58 to 20.71) g/L with roxadustat and 15.4 (11.34 to 19.50) g/L with rHuEPO-α (mean difference [95% CI], 1.7 [–3.39 to 6.84]). The lower bound of the one-sided 97.5% CI for the treatment difference (‒3.4 g/L) was greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of ‒6.6 g/L, establishing noninferiority. Noninferiority was supported by five of six key secondary end points. Rates of adverse events were generally comparable between treatments and consistent with previous findings. CONCLUSION Roxadustat was noninferior to rHuEPO-α in treating CIA in participants with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving multicycle treatments of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The oral formulation of roxadustat may potentially increase compliance.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 2
Published January 10, 2025
Pages 143-153
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

S

Shun Lu

J

Jiong Wu

J

Jin Jiang

Q

Qisen Guo

Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China

Y

Yan Yu

Department of Respiratory Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin China

Y

Yu Liu

H

Hua Zhang

L

Ling Qian

X

Xiumei Dai

Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China

Y

Yanyan Xie

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China

T

Ting Fu

T

Tyson Lee

FibroGen, Inc, San Francisco, CA

Y

Yan Lu

R

Rui Ma

College of Materials, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, iChEM, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, College of Energy, School of Life Sciences, College of Physical Science and Technology, and Discipline of Intelligent Instrument and Equipment

M

Mark D. Eisner

FibroGen, Inc, San Francisco, CA