Efficacy of perioperative and neoadjuvant therapies including immunotherapy in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA): A network meta-analysis (NMA).

Y Yashveer Chohan (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ) M Muhammad Umair Anjum (The Wright Center for GME, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States) S Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi (Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) A Ammad Raina (Midwestern University, AZCOM, Glendale, AZ) S Salman Ayub Jajja (NYMC-LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER, RI, Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States) K Kunwer Sufyan Faisal (Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan) D Diana I. Segovia (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) P Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior B Ben George (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) M Mojun Zhu (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) D Daniel H. Ahn (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) J Jason S. Starr (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) H Harry H. Yoon (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab I Irbaz Bin Riaz (Irbaz Bin Riaz, MD, PhD; R. Bryan Rumble, MSc; Thomas A. Hope, MD; Giuseppe Procopio, MD; and Neha Vapiwala, MD; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) M Mohamad Bassam Sonbol

Abstract

399 Background: The standard of care for resectable GEA adenocarcinomas is perioperative chemotherapy with the FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) regimen. Recent studies investigating the addition of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to perioperative chemotherapy have shown mixed results. An NMA can leverage both direct and indirect comparisons to evaluate the relative efficacies of available regimens in this setting. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched until August 27th, 2025. Eligible studies included phase 3 randomized trials evaluating perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- CPIs ± radiation in resectable GEA. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a frequentist NMA framework. Results: Fifteen trials including 8072 patients were analyzed. For DFS, perioperative durvalumab + FLOT (dFLOT) ranked highest (P-score = 0.99), followed by FLOT (P-score = 0.84) (HR for dFLOT vs. FLOT was 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86). dFLOT also ranked higher than perioperative pembrolizumab + cisplatin and fluorouracil/capecitabine (KN-585), though this comparison was not statistically significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40-1.04). Compared with CROSS, dFLOT showed superior DFS (HR of 0.48, 95% CI 0.36-0.63). For OS, dFLOT ranked the highest (P-score=0.95) and was superior to CROSS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.77). While dFLOT appeared favorable versus FLOT (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), this finding was primarily driven by MATTERHORN, which did not meet its prespecified OS significance boundary (P = 0.03 vs threshold P < 0.0001), and the proportional hazards assumption was violated. Similarly, no significant OS difference was observed between dFLOT and the KN-585 arms (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45-1.23). Conclusions: In this NMA, perioperative FLOT remained the benchmark regimen for resectable GEA. dFLOT has shown promising early results, ranking the highest for DFS and showing favorable, but not statistically definitive OS trends in comparison to FLOT. Importantly, the network enabled indirect comparisons not tested in head-to-head trials, demonstrating that dFLOT ranked above pembrolizumab+CF/CX (KN-585) without reaching statistical significance, and also outperformed CROSS. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as they are primarily driven MATTERHORN data in which OS did not cross the prespecified threshold and proportional hazards assumptions were violated. Perioperative immunotherapy combinations appear promising, but final MATTERHORN results and further confirmatory studies are needed before dFLOT can be considered as a new standard of care.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 399-399
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

Y

Yashveer Chohan

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

M

Muhammad Umair Anjum

The Wright Center for GME, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

S

Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

A

Ammad Raina

Midwestern University, AZCOM, Glendale, AZ

S

Salman Ayub Jajja

NYMC-LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER, RI, Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States

K

Kunwer Sufyan Faisal

Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan

D

Diana I. Segovia

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

P

Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior

B

Ben George

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

M

Mojun Zhu

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

D

Daniel H. Ahn

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

J

Jason S. Starr

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

H

Harry H. Yoon

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

I

Irbaz Bin Riaz

Irbaz Bin Riaz, MD, PhD; R. Bryan Rumble, MSc; Thomas A. Hope, MD; Giuseppe Procopio, MD; and Neha Vapiwala, MD; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

M

Mohamad Bassam Sonbol