Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of reduced vs. full initial dose androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.
Abstract
371 Background: The introduction of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) has significantly transformed the systemic treatment landscape for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, ARSI therapy is associated with substantial adverse events (AEs) and increased medical costs. Dose reduction may offer a strategy to mitigate AEs and reduce costs, yet the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of reduced-dose ARSIs in nmCRPC remain unclear. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 251 patients with nmCRPC who received ARSI therapy. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the initial ARSI dose: reduced-dose group (n = 46) and full-dose group (n = 205). Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were compared between groups. Monthly medical costs for first ARSI treatment were also evaluated. Results: The median age at nmCRPC diagnosis was 77 years, with a median follow-up of 46 months. The rates of any PSA response, PSA decline ≥50%, and PSA decline ≥90% were comparable between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (85% vs. 89%, P = 0.640; 74% vs. 76%, P = 0.785; 46% vs. 35%, P = 0.171, respectively). No significant differences were observed in PSA-PFS ( P = 0.307) or MFS ( P = 0.199) between the groups. After adjusting for confounding variables, reduced initial dose ARSI use was not significantly associated with shorter MFS ( P = 0.984; hazard ratio: 0.992; 95% confidence interval: 0.467–2.107). The incidence of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs did not differ significantly between the groups (33% vs. 24%, P = 0.171; 3.9% vs. 4.3%, P = 1.000). Monthly medication costs for first ARSI treatment were significantly lower in the reduced-dose group compared to the full-dose group ($998 vs. $1,644, P < 0.001), representing an approximate 40% cost reduction. Conclusions: Reduced-dose ARSI therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to full-dose treatment in patients with nmCRPC, while significantly lowering medication costs. Dose reduction may be a viable strategy to enhance cost-effectiveness without compromising clinical outcomes.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Naoki Fujita
Shumon Kato
Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
Yohei Kawashima
Masanao Shinohara
Ryuji Tabata
Department of Urology, Sano Kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan
Ryuma Tanaka
Fumiya Yoneyama
Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
Shingo Hatakeyama