Emergency presentation as a diagnostic failure phenotype in ovarian cancer: A National Inpatient analysis (NIS 2016–2023).
Abstract
e17575 Background: Ovarian cancer is generally diagnosed and managed through outpatient care pathways, yet a substantial proportion of patients are hospitalized through non-elective admission. Framing the emergency presentation itself as a care-delivery phenotype enables identification of system-level diagnostic failure patterns and high-risk inpatient trajectories. Methods: A survey-weighted analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016–2023 was performed. Adult ovarian cancer hospitalizations were identified using ICD-10-CM C56* in any diagnosis position. The exposure was non-elective vs elective admission using NIS elective status. Acute organ failure markers included sepsis (A40/A41 or R65.20/R65.21), shock (R57*), acute kidney injury (N17*), and respiratory failure (J96*). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, ICU-level care proxy (sepsis, shock, or respiratory failure), major complications (sepsis/shock/AKI/respiratory failure), failure-to-rescue (mortality among hospitalizations with major complications), length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost/charges. Survey-weighted multivariable models adjusted for demographics, payer, ZIP income quartile, weekend admission, hospital characteristics, and year. Results: The weighted cohort comprised 465,875 ovarian cancer hospitalizations, of which 70.5%were nonelective. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 4.82%. Compared with elective admissions, nonelective admissions had higher mortality (6.08% vs 1.82%), ICU-level care proxy use (24.3% vs 5.6%), and major complications (39.4% vs 12.1%), with marked enrichment of acute organ failure at presentation, including sepsis (14.3% vs 2.1%), acute kidney injury (25.2% vs 8.6%), and respiratory failure (13.7% vs 3.6%). Among admissions with major complications, mortality was higher with a non-elective presentation (12.7% vs 8.6%), indicating a failure-to-rescue gap. After adjustment, nonelective admission remained independently associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 3.11, 95% CI 2.67–3.62), ICU-level care (aOR 4.70, 95% CI 4.41–5.00), major complications (aOR 4.17, 95% CI 3.98–4.37), and failure-to-rescue (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82), as well as longer length of stay (+0.98 days). Mean hospitalization cost and charges were lower among non-elective admissions ($18,980 vs $25,189 and $67,250 vs $83,336), reflecting less planned oncologic care but greater acute care intensity. Conclusions: In contemporary U.S. inpatient care, most ovarian cancer hospitalizations occur through nonelective admission, defining a high-risk diagnostic failure phenotype with higher mortality, ICU escalation, major complications, and failure-to-rescue. This framework provides a scalable approach to benchmark emergency presentation and identify system-level opportunities to improve ovarian cancer care.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Cinthiya Chander
Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
Ramaditya Srinivasmurthy
Mount Sinai Morningside, NY, New York, United States
Riccesha Hattin
Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Rishi Kumar Nanda
Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Vegas, NV
Jason Ta
HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Consortium, HCA Florida Citrus Hospital, Florida, Florida, United States
Abbas Hussain
Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Charles Abraham Joseph Larson
Trinity School of Medicine, Warner Robins, GA
Daniel Thomas Jones
HCA Sunrise Health GME Consortium - MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, NV
Kyaw Zin Thein
3Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Las Vegas, United States