Final overall survival and new ctDNA analysis in MET-driven advanced papillary renal cancer (CALYPSO).

F Francesca Jackson-Spence (Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom) J James Larkin P Poulam Patel (Biodiscovery Institute School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK) B Begoña P. Valderrama (Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain) A Alejo Rodriguez-Vida (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain) M Maria Jose Mendez-Vidal (Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain) M Merrida Childress (Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA) W Wenshu Li P Patrick Boyle (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) A Amaya Gasco (Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA) A Aleksandra Markovets (Oncology Data Science and AI, AstraZeneca Oncology R&D, Boston, MA) R Ryan James Hartmaier (Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA) C Charlotte Ackerman (Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom) B Bernadett Emma Szabados (Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom) G Garima Priyadarshini (Barts Cancer Institure, London, United Kingdom) F Fahmida Jamal (Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom) T Thomas Powles (Department of Medical Oncology Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK) C Cristina Suarez (Department of Medical Oncology Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain)

Abstract

444 Background: Phase II data from the CALYPSO study (NCT02819596) has shown activity for durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) plus savolitinib (MET inhibitor) (D+S) in MET-driven advanced papillary renal cancer (aPRC), resulting in the ongoing randomised phase III study, SAMETA (NCT03091192). Here we present the final efficacy and new ctDNA analysis. Methods: The aPRC cohort was a single arm study of D+S in both untreated and previously treated disease. Efficacy endpoints include response rates (RR) as per RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PD-L1, TMB and MET status were analysed. Safety was assessed via CTC criteria. FoundationOne CDx was used to profile tissue in 41 patients. Plasma was collected for ctDNA analysis (FoundationOne Tracker analysis; n=21) at baseline (pre-treatment) and sequential time points on treatment. MET mutations were also tracked using F1 Tracker following identification by the F1CDx assay. Results: At 41 months follow-up, the RR in the Intention to Treat (ITT) aPRC population (n=41) was 34% (95% CI, 20-51) and 59% (95% CI, 33-82) in MET-driven patients (n=17). The median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.0-13.9) in the ITT population and 16.7 months (95% CI, 5.1-31.4) in MET-driven patients. The median OS was 18.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-30.6) in the ITT population and 27.4 months (95% CI, 9.3-51.6) in MET-driven patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and OS in MET-driven vs non-MET-driven in PRC cohort was 0.36 (p=0.02) and 0.76 (p=0.43), respectively. 66% of patients were PD-L1+, and 32% were both MET-driven/PD-L1+. The PD-L1 biomarker did not enrich for responders. 27% patients had tissue TMB >median (2.52mut/Mb). TMB was not associated with outcome. 10/16 (63%) were ctDNA positive at baseline, which was associated with a shorter median OS of 7.3 vs 36.4 months (HR 3.91, p=0.02). The mean reduction in Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) was 43% with therapy. For patients with pre- and on-treatment ctDNA, those with CR/PR had ctDNA VAF reduction while those with SD/PD had ctDNA VAF increase (p=0.05). ctDNA clearance was associated with improved PFS (p=0.04). Only 2 patients had MET mutations tracked. ctDNA positivity did not correlate with MET alterations, PD-L1 status or the presence of visceral metastases. Conclusions: D+S continue to show impressive efficacy in MET driven tumors, supporting the ongoing SAMETA trial. ctDNA monitoring on therapy holds promise as a prognostic and potentially predictive tool in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02819596 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 444-444
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

F

Francesca Jackson-Spence

Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom

J

James Larkin

P

Poulam Patel

Biodiscovery Institute School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

B

Begoña P. Valderrama

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain

A

Alejo Rodriguez-Vida

Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

M

Maria Jose Mendez-Vidal

Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain

M

Merrida Childress

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA

W

Wenshu Li

P

Patrick Boyle

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

A

Amaya Gasco

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA

A

Aleksandra Markovets

Oncology Data Science and AI, AstraZeneca Oncology R&D, Boston, MA

R

Ryan James Hartmaier

Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA

C

Charlotte Ackerman

Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

B

Bernadett Emma Szabados

Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

G

Garima Priyadarshini

Barts Cancer Institure, London, United Kingdom

F

Fahmida Jamal

Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom

T

Thomas Powles

Department of Medical Oncology Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK

C

Cristina Suarez

Department of Medical Oncology Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain