First in human PK analysis of antibody conjugated liposome encapsulating doxorubicin (HF-K1) in advanced cancer patients: Comparison with ADCs.

M Minal A. Barve (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX) S Shanshan Jin X Xun Wang H Hailong Wu N Nayyar T. Syed (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) F Fengwei Xu (Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.) R Reva Schneider (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) N Ntombizodwa Sayi (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) C Christiana Panciotti (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) R Reza Chalangari (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) R Rachel Won (Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX) Y Yuhong Xu (School of Physical Sciences and Technology Ningbo University Ningbo China)

Abstract

e15011 Background: Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have been shown to have a better therapeutic index however there have been reports of serious toxicity limiting their use. We propose that it may be due to the relatively low drug to antibody ratio (DAR) which limits the efficacy and toxicity window. HF-K1 is a liposome containing trastuzumab FAB conjugated lipid (TL01) in lipid bilayer encapsulating doxorubicin. Each HF-K1 liposome has in average 12 TL01 and 2.9K molecules of doxorubicin with a calculated drug to antibody ratio of 245. The liposomes bind to HER2 on cancer cells with similar affinity as ADCs, are taken up via endocytosis and release the drug intracellularly. Methods: For examining the liposome particle pharmacokinetics, intact liposomes were captured using an anti-trastuzumab Mab and quantified based on an ELISA assay. The liposome particle number vs. time curve was fitted with a one-compartment model. In addition, the liposome penetration into tumor tissues and the binding and uptake processes were modeled using a physiology-based model. For comparison, PK parameters from reported DS8201a and T-DM1 clinical data were converted into the unit of molecular numbers and estimated. Results: Table 1 listed the liposome particle PK parameters at the liposome dose of 1.3*10 13 /kg. Compared to ADCs, the liposome particles are bigger, fewer particles are injected, and the circulation half-life is slightly shorter. However, since efficacy mainly results from the drugs taken up by cancer cells rather than the systemic exposure, we calculated the numbers of liposome particles and ADC molecules that could be internalized from 0 to 72 hours after injection. We modeled different scenarios when the cancer cells have either high or low HER2 expression and fast or slow endocytosis. Conclusions: Based on the analysis, we identified that with similar endocytosis rates, the greater DAR could lead to higher intracellular drug uptake with HF-K1 as compared to DS8201a and T-DM1. We therefore anticipate better clinical efficacy with HF-K1. HF-K1 is currently being evaluated in an ongoing study (NCT05861895) in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2 expression (IHC 1+, 2+, 3+). Clinical trial information: NCT05861895 . HF-K1 (45mg/m 2 doxorubicine) DS8201a (5.4mg/kg) T-DM1 (3.6mg/kg) Dose (number/kg) 1.3*10 13 2.16*10 16 1.46*10 16 Cmax (number/ml) 8*10 12 5.0*10 14 3.22*10 14 T1/2 (hours) ~70 ~139 ~96 Systemic AUC(number*h/mL) 8*10 14 5.7*10 16 4.5*10 16 Clearance (mL/h/kg) 0.8 0.42 0.33 Vss (mL/Kg) 58 75.2 ~40 *Tumor cell HER2 expression High Low Low High *Tumor cell endocytosis rate (number/h) 50 300 1000 50 300 3000 3000 Internalized number per tumor cell (number/72hr) 5243 5903 4870 929 2962 152204 556304 Estimated drug/payloads per tumor cell (millions/72hr) 16 18 15 3.0 9.0 1.2 2.0 *: These parameters were hypothesized based on studies of HER2 expression and cell endocytosis in the literature.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

M

Minal A. Barve

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX

S

Shanshan Jin

X

Xun Wang

H

Hailong Wu

N

Nayyar T. Syed

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

F

Fengwei Xu

Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.

R

Reva Schneider

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

N

Ntombizodwa Sayi

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

C

Christiana Panciotti

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

R

Reza Chalangari

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

R

Rachel Won

Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Mary Crowley, Dallas, TX

Y

Yuhong Xu

School of Physical Sciences and Technology Ningbo University Ningbo China