First-line (1L) camizestrant (CAMI) for emergent <i>ESR1</i> mutations ( <i>ESR1</i> m) in advanced breast cancer (ABC): Final progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) from the phase III SERENA-6 trial.

F François Clément Bidard E Erica L. Mayer Y Yeon Hee Park W Wolfgang Janni C Cynthia X. Ma M Massimo Cristofanilli (Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York) G Giampaolo Bianchini (IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan) K Kevin Kalinsky (Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta) H Hiroji Iwata (Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan) S Stephen K.L. Chia (BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada) A Adam Brufsky (Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh) P Peter A. Fasching Z Zbigniew Nowecki (Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland) J Javier Pascual (Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain) N Nuri Karadurmus (Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey) E Einav Nili Gal-Yam (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) A Arkendu Chatterjee (Late Development, Oncology R&amp;D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD) M Manuel Selvi Miralles (Late Development, Oncology R&amp;D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) C Cynthia Huang Bartlett (Pfizer, New York) N Nicholas Turner

Abstract

LBA1007 Background: CAMI is a next-generation SERD and complete ER antagonist. SERENA-6 enrolled patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− ABC receiving 1L aromatase inhibitor (AI) + CDK4/6i and without disease progression. Switching to CAMI, with continued CDK4/6i, at ESR1 m emergence during 1L AI + CDK4/6i significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.31–0.60]; p&lt;0.0001; median follow-up: 12.6 mo). Here, we report the final PFS2 results. Methods: SERENA-6 was powered for PFS (primary endpoint) and the key secondary endpoint of investigator-assessed PFS2 (time from randomization to the earliest of disease progression after first subsequent therapy or death). Pts had scans to assess PFS2 every 8–12 weeks after first progression. PFS2 analysis was planned after ~158 PFS2 events (77% power to detect HR of 0.65) and analyzed using an adjusted log-rank test and a 2-sided significance level of ~5%. Chemotherapy/ADC-free survival was a secondary endpoint. Results: 157 pts were randomized to CAMI + CDK4/6i and 158 pts to AI + CDK4/6i. After 23.5 mo median follow-up (data cutoff: Jan 3, 2026), median PFS2 was 25.7 mo with CAMI + CDK4/6i vs 19.1 mo with AI + CDK4/6i; statistically significant improvement, HR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46–0.86); p=0.00373 (Table). Endocrine-based therapy was the most common first subsequent treatment (CAMI + CDK4/6i arm, 55.2%; AI + CDK4/6i arm, 66.7%). CAMI + CDK4/6i prolonged chemotherapy/ADC-free survival (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.47–0.87]; nominal p=0.00375; Table) and TTD in GHS/QoL (0.48 [0.31–0.76]); nominal p&lt;0.001). PFS benefit with CAMI + CDK4/6i was maintained with longer follow-up (Table); 30-mo PFS rate was 30.4% vs 2.7% with continued AI + CDK4/6i. PFS benefit was not impacted by common co-mutations ( PIK3CA in 41.3% of pts, HR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.28–0.68]; TP53 in 25.4% of pts, 0.49 [0.30–0.82]). At 30% maturity, OS HR was 0.87 (0.57–1.30). Safety was consistent with previous results. Conclusions: Switching to CAMI + CDK4/6i at ESR1 m emergence continued to result in PFS benefit, with approximately a third of pts still progression-free at 30 mo. PFS benefit was maintained beyond first progression; PFS2 was significantly improved and the clinically meaningful endpoint of chemotherapy/ADC-free survival was prolonged vs continuing AI + CDK4/6i. These results continue to support a switch to CAMI + CDK4/6i for pts with ESR1 m during 1L therapy to delay disease progression and deteriorations in QoL. Clinical trial information: NCT04964934 . DCO3 CAMI + CDK4/6i (n=157) AI + CDK4/6i (n=158) HR (95% CI) PFS Events, n (%)Median, mo24-mo rate, %30-mo rate, % 99 (63.1)16.834.930.4 124 (78.5)9.214.22.7 0.45 (0.34–0.59); p&lt;0.00001 PFS2 Events, n (%)Median, mo24-mo rate, %30-mo rate, % 80 (51.0)25.750.841.5 90 (57.0)19.136.329.7 0.63 (0.46–0.86); p=0.00373 Chemotherapy/ADC-free survival Events, n (%)Median, mo 85 (54.1)22.6 98 (62.0)18.7 0.64 (0.47–0.87); nominal p=0.00375

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 17_suppl
Published June 10, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

F

François Clément Bidard

E

Erica L. Mayer

Y

Yeon Hee Park

W

Wolfgang Janni

C

Cynthia X. Ma

M

Massimo Cristofanilli

Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York

G

Giampaolo Bianchini

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan

K

Kevin Kalinsky

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta

H

Hiroji Iwata

Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan

S

Stephen K.L. Chia

BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

A

Adam Brufsky

Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh

P

Peter A. Fasching

Z

Zbigniew Nowecki

Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland

J

Javier Pascual

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain

N

Nuri Karadurmus

Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey

E

Einav Nili Gal-Yam

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

A

Arkendu Chatterjee

Late Development, Oncology R&amp;D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD

M

Manuel Selvi Miralles

Late Development, Oncology R&amp;D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

C

Cynthia Huang Bartlett

Pfizer, New York

N

Nicholas Turner