First-line fovinaciclib versus placebo combined with aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: A randomized, double-blind phase 3 study.

P Peng Yuan B Binghe Xu (Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing) Y Yunjiang Liu W Wei Li H Huiping Li Z Zhongsheng Tong J Jing Cheng M Mingjuan Zhang (Siyuan Laboratory, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanophotonic Manipulation, Department of Physics, Jinan University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632,) J Jinlu Shan (Amy Medical Center of PLA, Chongqing, China) J Jincai Zhong (The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China) T Tienan Yi J Jian Liu H Huihui Li (CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication) Z Zhen Huang J Jinsheng Wu (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China) S Sijuan Ding L Liang Li Y Yuhui Peng X Xiaoran Yang

Abstract

1090 Background: Endocrine therapy combined with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor is the standard first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Fovinaciclib is a novel CDK4/6 inhibitor that showed survival benefit when added to fulvestrant in the later-line setting. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of fovinaciclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as initial therapy. Methods: Adult women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were enrolled across 63 centers. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral fovinaciclib (200 mg, once daily, days 1–21) or placebo plus an AI (letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg, orally, once daily, days 1–28) in 28-day cycles. Pre- or perimenopausal patients also received goserelin (3.6 mg, subcutaneous, day 1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included other efficacy endpoints and safety. Results: A total of 417 patients were assigned to the fovinaciclib ( n = 208) or placebo arm ( n = 209) with balanced baseline characteristics. At the protocol-specified interim analysis (median follow-up 16.6 months, data cutoff date June 25, 2024), adding fovinaciclib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.77; p = 0.0003): median PFS was not reached in the fovinaciclib arm and 20.2 months (95% CI 16.4 months–not evaluable) in the placebo arm. The 2-year PFS rates were 65.5% (95% CI 55.3%–73.9%) and 38.9% (95% CI 27.5%–50.2%), respectively. Consistent PFS benefit was observed in investigator assessments (hazard ratio 0.49 [95% CI 0.36–0.68], p < 0.0001) and across most subgroups. Fovinaciclib also showed favorable results across secondary efficacy endpoints. OS data remain immature. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 207 (99.5%) and 199 (95.2%) patients in the fovinaciclib and placebo arms, respectively, with serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in 30 (14.4%) and 24 (11.5%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs was only 1.4% in both arms. The most common TEAEs were hematologic toxicities, which did not lead to SAEs or study drug discontinuation. Grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities (2.4% versus 0) or renal toxicities (0 versus 0.5%) were rare. Conclusions: Adding fovinaciclib to first-line AI therapy provided a significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit, along with consistent improvements in other survival outcomes and a manageable safety profile. These findings support fovinaciclib as a first-line treatment option for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05439499 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1090-1090
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

P

Peng Yuan

B

Binghe Xu

Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing

Y

Yunjiang Liu

W

Wei Li

H

Huiping Li

Z

Zhongsheng Tong

J

Jing Cheng

M

Mingjuan Zhang

Siyuan Laboratory, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanophotonic Manipulation, Department of Physics, Jinan University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632,

J

Jinlu Shan

Amy Medical Center of PLA, Chongqing, China

J

Jincai Zhong

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China

T

Tienan Yi

J

Jian Liu

H

Huihui Li

CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication

Z

Zhen Huang

J

Jinsheng Wu

The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China

S

Sijuan Ding

L

Liang Li

Y

Yuhui Peng

X

Xiaoran Yang