First-line fovinaciclib versus placebo combined with aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: A randomized, double-blind phase 3 study.
Abstract
1090 Background: Endocrine therapy combined with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor is the standard first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Fovinaciclib is a novel CDK4/6 inhibitor that showed survival benefit when added to fulvestrant in the later-line setting. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of fovinaciclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as initial therapy. Methods: Adult women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were enrolled across 63 centers. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral fovinaciclib (200 mg, once daily, days 1–21) or placebo plus an AI (letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg, orally, once daily, days 1–28) in 28-day cycles. Pre- or perimenopausal patients also received goserelin (3.6 mg, subcutaneous, day 1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included other efficacy endpoints and safety. Results: A total of 417 patients were assigned to the fovinaciclib ( n = 208) or placebo arm ( n = 209) with balanced baseline characteristics. At the protocol-specified interim analysis (median follow-up 16.6 months, data cutoff date June 25, 2024), adding fovinaciclib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.77; p = 0.0003): median PFS was not reached in the fovinaciclib arm and 20.2 months (95% CI 16.4 months–not evaluable) in the placebo arm. The 2-year PFS rates were 65.5% (95% CI 55.3%–73.9%) and 38.9% (95% CI 27.5%–50.2%), respectively. Consistent PFS benefit was observed in investigator assessments (hazard ratio 0.49 [95% CI 0.36–0.68], p < 0.0001) and across most subgroups. Fovinaciclib also showed favorable results across secondary efficacy endpoints. OS data remain immature. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 207 (99.5%) and 199 (95.2%) patients in the fovinaciclib and placebo arms, respectively, with serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in 30 (14.4%) and 24 (11.5%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs was only 1.4% in both arms. The most common TEAEs were hematologic toxicities, which did not lead to SAEs or study drug discontinuation. Grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities (2.4% versus 0) or renal toxicities (0 versus 0.5%) were rare. Conclusions: Adding fovinaciclib to first-line AI therapy provided a significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit, along with consistent improvements in other survival outcomes and a manageable safety profile. These findings support fovinaciclib as a first-line treatment option for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05439499 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Peng Yuan
Binghe Xu
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
Yunjiang Liu
Wei Li
Huiping Li
Zhongsheng Tong
Jing Cheng
Mingjuan Zhang
Siyuan Laboratory, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanophotonic Manipulation, Department of Physics, Jinan University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632,
Jinlu Shan
Amy Medical Center of PLA, Chongqing, China
Jincai Zhong
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
Tienan Yi
Jian Liu
Huihui Li
CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication
Zhen Huang
Jinsheng Wu
The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
Sijuan Ding
Liang Li
Yuhui Peng
Xiaoran Yang