Frequency and determinants of reproductive organ involvement in female patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

M Mazyar Zahir F Farshad Sheybaee Moghadam (USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) A Alireza Ghoreifi (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) S Seyedeh Sanam Ladi Seyedian (Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) H Hooman Ebrahimi (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) G Gus Miranda (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) J Jie Cai (National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry) M Monish Aron (USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) M Mihir Desai (USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) I Inderbir Gill (USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) A Anne K. Schuckman (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) S Siamak Daneshmand (Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center) H Hooman Djaladat (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA)

Abstract

699 Background: Traditionally, radical cystectomy (RC) in females includes removal of adjacent reproductive organs (RO) along with the bladder and regional lymph nodes. The growing adoption of reproductive organ-sparing RC underscores the need to better understand the frequency and preoperative predictors of reproductive organ involvement (ROI). Methods: We utilized our prospectively maintained, IRB-approved RC database to identify all female patients who underwent RC between 2003 and 2024. Patients with a history of prior surgery on ROs were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression model was applied to identify predictors of ROI. Results: A total of 324 female patients were included in the analysis, of whom 42 (13.0%) demonstrated ROI. Baseline characteristics are shown Table 1. The most involved RO was vagina (N=25, 7.7%), followed by the cervix (N=24, 7.4%), uterus (N=21, 6.5%), and fallopian tubes/ovaries (N=4, 1.2%). Among the 18 patients with involvement of a single RO, the vagina was the most frequently affected (N=10, 3.1%), followed by the uterus (N=5, 1.5%). The strongest correlations of ROI were observed between the cervix and uterus (r = 0.6) and between the vagina and cervix (r = 0.5; both p < .001). In multivariate analysis, extravesical disease (OR: 17.2, 95% CI: 6.8 – 43.1, p<.001) or lymph node positivity (OR: 17.5, 95% CI: 6.1 – 50.1, p=.001) in clinical staging, along with higher comorbidity burden (Charleson comorbidity index ≥ 2 vs. 0: OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 6.8 – 43.1, p= 0.020) were predictive of ROI. In patients with ROI, the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.3 and 12.4 months, respectively. Predictably, log-rank analyses demonstrated significantly worse OS and RFS in patients with ROI compared to those without (both p<.001). Conclusions: ROI was identified in approximately 13% of female patients undergoing RC. Reproductive organ-sparing surgery should not be offered to patients presenting with extravesical or lymph node-positive disease, or those with a higher comorbidity burden. Demographics and perioperative characteristics stratified by reproductive organ involvement. Patient characteristics No ROI (N=282) ROI (N=42) P value Age (yrs.), mean ± SD 67.7 ± 11.0 67.9 ± 12.3 0.798 Charleson Comorbidity Index, n(%) 0.028  0 83 (29.4%) 5 (11.9%%)  1 84 (29.8%) 12 (28.6%)  >=2 115 (40.8%) 25 (59.5%) Clinical Staging, n(%) <0.001  Organ confined (≤ cT2N0) 218 (77.3%) 7 (16.7%)  Extravesical (> cT2N0) 39 (13.8%) 23 (54.8%)  Lymph node positive (cN+) 25 (8.9%) 12 (28.6%) Positive Bimanual Examination, n(%) 25 (8.9%) 11 (26.2%) <0.001 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n(%) 78 (27.7%) 16 (38.1%) 0.164

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 699-699
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

M

Mazyar Zahir

F

Farshad Sheybaee Moghadam

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

A

Alireza Ghoreifi

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

S

Seyedeh Sanam Ladi Seyedian

Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

H

Hooman Ebrahimi

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

G

Gus Miranda

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

J

Jie Cai

National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry

M

Monish Aron

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

M

Mihir Desai

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

I

Inderbir Gill

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

A

Anne K. Schuckman

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

S

Siamak Daneshmand

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

H

Hooman Djaladat

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA