From Metal‐Centered Catalysis to Organic Orbital Programming in Photoelectrocatalysis

X Xiaojun Li J Jialu Liu (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China) X Xiayan Zhang X Xiang Li J Jia Wang M Mingyu Sun (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China) S Shengwei Kong (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China) G Guoqing Zhang M Mengzhou Zhang (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China) X Xinjian Shi (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Photoelectrocatalysis has traditionally relied on inorganic metals and compounds, where activity is optimized through crystal field regulation, band alignment, and defect engineering. However, periodic lattice structures intrinsically constrain orbital degeneracy, energy‐level reconstruction, and molecular‐scale control of intermediate adsorption, electron transfer, and reaction flux. Purely organic photoelectrocatalytic materials offer a distinct paradigm based on π‐conjugated frameworks, in which frontier orbitals, energy‐level splitting, electron delocalization, and polarization can be precisely programmed through molecular design. Donor–acceptor architectures, orbital overlap, and electronic asymmetry regulate exciton binding, charge separation, interfacial coupling, and intermediate electronic occupation, thereby linking photocarrier dynamics directly with reaction barriers and pathway selection. In water splitting, CO 2 reduction, N 2 reduction, and photoelectrochemical organic synthesis, such orbital‐level tunability enables refined control over proton‐coupled electron transfer, transition‐state stabilization, and selectivity beyond conventional metal‐centered descriptors. This review analyzes the principles of electronic structure control and interfacial reaction mechanisms in purely organic photoelectrocatalytic materials from atomic and orbital perspectives, highlights their distinctions from inorganic systems in energy level construction and reaction pathway regulation, and outlines a theoretical foundation for developing organic–inorganic cooperative platforms that combine orbital programmability with structural stability.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published July 22, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (10)

X

Xiaojun Li

J

Jialu Liu

National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China

X

Xiayan Zhang

X

Xiang Li

J

Jia Wang

M

Mingyu Sun

National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China

S

Shengwei Kong

National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China

G

Guoqing Zhang

M

Mengzhou Zhang

National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China

X

Xinjian Shi

National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Applied Technology of Hybrid Nanomaterials School of Nanoscience and Materials Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China