Genomic profiling in circulating tumor DNA from a multicenter prospective study of radium-223 in bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The KYUCOG-1901 study.

M Masaki Shiota M Maki Fujiwara (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) T Takayuki Sumiyoshi H Hideki Enokida (Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan) T Tomomi Kamba T Tsukasa Igawa N Naoya Masumori H Hirotsugu Uemura T Toshiyuki Kamoto (University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan) K Katsuyoshi Higashijima (Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan) K Kensuke Mitsunari (Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan) H Hiroji Uemura T Takashi Kobayashi S Shusuke Akamatsu S Shoji Tokunaga M Masatoshi Eto (Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University)

Abstract

211 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has emerged as a novel approach in cancer precision medicine. We investigated the genomic landscape and clinical utility of ctDNA in patients receiving radium-223 (Ra-223) for bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: This prospective observational multicenter study enrolled patients treated with Ra-223 for bone-mCRPC. Targeted sequencing of cell-free DNA from plasma at baseline (BL) and end of treatment (EOT), along with paired leukocyte DNA, was performed using an 88-gene panel. Associations between ctDNA profiles and clinical outcomes including biomarker response, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Of 93 patients analyzed, ctDNA was successfully profiled in 84 BL and 74 EOT samples, with matched data available for 68 patients. A ctDNA fraction ≥5% (rPFS; hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 2.44, 1.47-4.08), as well as TP53 alteration (rPFS; HR, 95% CI; 2.65, 1.30-5.42), alterations in TP53 , RB1 or PTEN (rPFS; HR, 95% CI; 3.57, 2.04-6.25), and cell cycle pathway alterations (rPFS; HR, 95% CI; 3.47, 2.00-6.25) at BL, were significantly associated with shorter rPFS and OS. Dynamic changes in ctDNA between BL and EOT correlated with distinct PSA-PFS, ALP-PFS, rPFS, and OS although PSA and ALP declines were not associated. Conclusions: ctDNA profiling outperformed PSA and ALP in monitoring disease trajectory and predicting outcomes. These findings highlight ctDNA as a promising biomarker to guide and optimize Ra-223 therapy in mCRPC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000040358 . Association between ctDNA profile at baseline and radiographic progression-free survival.   Median, 8.8 months Univariate analysis Adjusted with ctDNA fraction   n=84 HR 95% CI P–values   HR 95% CI P–values DNA amount  cfDNA amount, ≥20 ng/ml 18 3.4 1.56 0.89–2.75 0.12  ctDNA fraction, ≥5% 32 5.6 2.44 1.47–4.08 0.0006* Altered gene  AR 13 5.7 2.18 1.18–4.03 0.013* 1.80 0.92–3.52 0.087  TP53 9 3.4 2.65 1.30–5.42 0.0077* 2.46 1.19–5.09 0.016*  RB1 9 3.3 2.94 1.42–6.10 0.0037* 2.04 0.73–5.69 0.17  BRCA2 12 4.5 1.71 0.89–3.29 0.11 1.28 0.62–2.66 0.51  MSH6 9 6.2 1.06 0.48–2.33 0.88 1.07 0.48–2.34 0.87  CHD1 9 3.5 2.10 1.03–4.25 0.040* 1.47 0.64–3.37 0.37  APC 13 6.2 1.49 0.79–2.79 0.21 1.22 0.62–2.38 0.56  SPOP 9 5.5 2.45 1.19–5.08 0.015* 1.76 0.75–4.16 0.20  ZFHX3 10 5.6 2.07 1.01–4.26 0.047* 1.17 0.43–3.20 0.76  TP53/RB1/PTEN 20 3.4 3.57 2.04–6.25 <0.0001* 3.60 1.80–7.21 0.0003* Altered pathway  AR–associated 9 3.1 2.70 1.32–5.55 0.0067* 1.94 0.82–4.63 0.13  Cell cycle 22 3.5 3.47 2.00–6.03 <0.0001* 3.50 1.79–6.85 0.0003*  PI3K 16 3.5 2.26 1.26–4.06 0.0063* 1.86 0.96–3.61 0.066  DNA repair 23 5.7 1.53 0.89–2.62 0.12 1.21 0.65–2.25 0.54  Chromatin modifier 18 6.0 1.73 0.99–3.02 0.055 1.46 0.80–2.68 0.22  WNT 15 6.2 1.50 0.83–2.72 0.18 1.28 0.69–2.40 0.44

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 211-211
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

M

Masaki Shiota

M

Maki Fujiwara

Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

T

Takayuki Sumiyoshi

H

Hideki Enokida

Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan

T

Tomomi Kamba

T

Tsukasa Igawa

N

Naoya Masumori

H

Hirotsugu Uemura

T

Toshiyuki Kamoto

University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan

K

Katsuyoshi Higashijima

Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan

K

Kensuke Mitsunari

Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

H

Hiroji Uemura

T

Takashi Kobayashi

S

Shusuke Akamatsu

S

Shoji Tokunaga

M

Masatoshi Eto

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University