Genomic risk classifier performance in PET-guided post-prostatectomy patients: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial.
Abstract
386 Background: Genomic risk assessment with genomic classifiers (GC) have enhanced risk stratification in post-prostatectomy patients, however, validation studies have relied on conventional imaging workup to guide secondary radiation treatment (SRT). Our hypothesis is that GC will remain prognostic in a population receiving PET-guided SRT. Methods: We performed a protocol-specified whole-transcriptome assay (Decipher GC, Veracyte) on prostatectomy specimens from patients enrolled on a randomized trial studying event-free survival [EFS: biochemical/clinical/radiologic progression or systemic therapy initiation] of 18F-fluciclovine or 68Ga-PSMA-11 guided SRT with incorporated PET-guided dose escalation. Treatment volumes and prescription doses were rigidly defined on protocol: no uptake/prostate bed (PB) only - PB XRT (64.8-70.2Gy at 1.8Gy/fx); pelvic nodal (PLN) +/- PB uptake – PLN (45-50.4Gy @ 1.8Gy/fx) + PB XRT; extrapelvic – no XRT. Sites of PET uptake received simultaneous integrated boosts (SIB) of 74-76Gy at 2Gy/fx in PB and 54-56Gy at 2Gy/fx in PLN. GCs were categorized as low (0-0.44), intermediate (0.45-0.6) and high (>0.6) as reported for commercial testing. An optimal cutoff maximizing separation above (AOC) vs below (BOC) was identified using a bias-adjusted log-rank test. Z-test was performed at specified time points to assess EFS between cohorts per study protocol. Results: Of 140 patients enrolled on trial, 69 (49.3%) had prostatectomy specimens available for GC analysis with 44 (63.8%) high, 11 (15.9%) intermediate and 14 (20.3%) low scores. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in 4/14 (28.6%) low, 8/11 (72.7%) intermediate, and 36/44 (81.8%) high GC patients based on clinical characteristics. Minimum follow-up was 2.00 years (median 2.9 yrs, range: 2.0-5.0 yrs). High GC was associated with worse 4-year EFS compared to low GC (56.5% vs 84.6%, p<0.01). Optimal GC cutoff was 0.84 with 28 AOC (23/28 with ADT) and 41 BOC (25/41 with ADT). Score AOC was associated with worse 3-year (69.6% vs 89.3%, p<0.01) and 4-year (46.4% vs 70.2% p=0.01) EFS compared to BOC. Use of SIB was associated with improved EFS in score BOC at 2 and 3-years post treatment (81.8% vs 92.3% at both time points, p=0.03); however, SIB was not associated with improved EFS in score AOC at 2 years or beyond. Conclusions: GC remained prognostic for EFS in post-prostatectomy patients treated with PET-guided radiation when assessed at commercial and optimal cutoff values. Dose escalation to sites of PET uptake was associated with improved EFS at 2+ years in BOC (<0.84) patients. Creation of an integrated radiogenomic model based on PET findings and GC is forthcoming.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Vishal Ramesh Dhere
Emory University, Atlanta, GA
David M. Schuster
Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Subir Goyal
Emory University, Decatur, Georgia, United States
Eduard Schreibmann
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Nikhil Sebastian
Emory University, Decatur, Georgia, United States
Sagar Anil Patel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Sheela Hanasoge
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Joseph W. Shelton
Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Pretesh R. Patel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Bruce Warren Hershatter
Emory Healthcare, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
Olayinka A. Abiodun-Ojo
Emory Unversity School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Ismaheel Lawal
Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Adeboye O. Osunkoya
Departments of Pathology and Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Carlos Moreno
Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Ashesh B. Jani
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA