Germline testing in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study of germline genetic testing uptake, patterns of referral, clinical findings and impact in the South Western Sydney Local Health District.

H Huei Ti Soh (South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia) S Stephanie Hui-Su Lim (Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia) E Emilia Ip (Liverpool Cancer Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia) W Weng Leong Ng (Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia) A Annette Tognela (Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Campbelltown, Australia) A Aflah Roohullah R Robert Yoon (Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia) R Ray Asghari V Verna Fargas (Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown, Australia)

Abstract

115 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival <12%. Universal germline genetic testing is recommended as pathogenic variants are identified in 8–15% of patients and guide therapy: BRCA1/2 and PALB2 predict platinum and PARP inhibitor sensitivity, while mismatch repair deficiency predicts immunotherapy response. Mutation detection rates in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations are not well described and may be influenced by inequitable access to genetic services. We evaluated germline testing patterns in PDAC patients within the culturally diverse South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of PDAC diagnosed in SWSLHD (Jan 2020–Jun 2025). Data were extracted from electronic medical records and oncology databases. Variables included demographics, CALD status, tumour stage, referral pathway (mainstreaming vs genetics clinic), germline testing uptake and results, tumour molecular testing, treatment, and survival. Primary outcomes were germline referral and testing rates. Results: 60/300 diagnosed patients were analysed to date (data collection ongoing). 15/60 (25%) were referred for germline testing; 13/15 completed testing and 2/15 did not proceed (1 unclear, 1 deceased). Of those referred, 9/15 were Australian-born and 6/15 overseas-born; interpreter use was documented in 1 case. Family history of cancer was present in 8/15, absent in 3/15, and undocumented in 4/15. No patients underwent somatic next-generation sequencing and MMR testing was not routinely performed. No pathogenic variants were detected. 2/13 (15%) had variants of uncertain significance; both received genetic counselling and management did not change. Conclusions: Preliminary data demonstrate low germline testing rates (25%) within a highly diverse Australian population. The observed VUS rate (15%) is consistent with published literature (approximately 15–25%). Despite universal testing recommendations, implementation gaps remain. Ongoing data collection will determine whether overall pathogenic variant detection approaches expected rates (8–15%) and will inform strategies to improve equitable access to precision oncology in PDAC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 19_suppl
Published July 01, 2026
Pages 115-115
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

H

Huei Ti Soh

South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

S

Stephanie Hui-Su Lim

Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia

E

Emilia Ip

Liverpool Cancer Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

W

Weng Leong Ng

Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

A

Annette Tognela

Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Campbelltown, Australia

A

Aflah Roohullah

R

Robert Yoon

Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia

R

Ray Asghari

V

Verna Fargas

Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown, Australia